Data Infrastructure Resource Links cloud data protection tradecraft trends

Data Infrastructure Resource Links Server Storage I/O Network

data infrastructure resource links server storage I/O cloud data protection tradecraft links

By Greg Schulzwww.storageioblog.com April 28, 2018

Various data infrastructure resource links.

SDDC Data Infrastructure

The following are a collection of server storageioblog data infrastructure resource links.

Where to learn more

Vmware Vsphere Vsan Vcenter Version 6 7 Summary

Vmware Vsphere Vsan Vcenter V6 7 Sddc Details

Vmware Vsphere Vsan Server Storage Io Enhancements

New Cloud Act Data Regulation

Data Protection Recovery World Backup Day

Aws Cloud Application Data Protection Webinar

Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Insiders Preview

March 2018 Data Infrastructure Update Newsletter

Application Data Value Characteristics Part1

4 3 2 1 Data Protection Availability

Application Data Characteristics Types Part3

Application Data Volume Velocity

Application Data Access Life Cycle

Veeam Gdpr Experiences Walking Talk

Vmware Continues Cloud Construction March Announcements

Cloud Benefits Hyperv Disaster Recovery Draas

World Backup Day 2018 Data Protection Readiness Reminder

Install Intel Optane Nvme U2 8639 Ssd Drive In Pcie Slot

Data Infrastructure Resource Links Tradecraft Trends

Achieve Flexible Data Protection Availability Flash Storage Solutions Webinar

2017 Holiday Greetings From Serverstorageio

November 2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Update Newsletter

Transformation Serverless Life Beyond Devops New York Times Cto Nick Rockwell

Data Protection Fundamentals

Reliability Availability Serviceability Ras Data Protection Fundamentals

Data Protection Acess Availabity Raid Erasure Codes

Enabling Data Protection Rpo Archive Backup Cdp Pit Copy Snapshots Versions

Point Time Data Protection Granularity Points Interest

Nvme Place Volatile Memory Express

Nand Flash Ssd Storage Io Conversation

Welcome To The Obeject Storage Resources Center

Server And Storage Io Benchmark Resources

Server Storage Io Converged Infrastructure Hci Overview

Data Protection Diaries Main

Data Infrastructure Server Storage Io Networking Recommended Reading Book Shelf Blogtober

Gdpr General Data Protection Regulation Resources Areyou Ready

Data Infrastructure Primer Overview

Data Infrastructure Tradecraft Overview

Announcing Software Defined Data Infrastructure Sddc Book

Travel Fun Crossword Puzzle Vmworld 2017 Las Vegas

Hot Popular Trending Data Infrastructure Vendors Watch

Data Protection Security Logical Physical Software Defined

Data Protection Tools Technologies Toolbox Buzzword Bingo Trends

Walking Data Protection Talk

Whos Toolbox Technology Tools

Data Protection Resources Learn

October 2017 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Introducing Windows Subsystem For Linux Wsl

Enterprise Hdd Content Servers

Why Fc And Fcoe Vendors Get Beat Up Over Bandwidth

Are Vmware Vvols In Your Virtual Server And Storage Io Future

Putting Some Vmware Esx Storage Tips Together Part I

Server Storage Io Memory Dram Nand Flash

Intel Micron 3d Xpoint Nvm Scm Pm Nvme Ssd

Garbage Data In Garbage Information Out Big Data Or Big Garbage

Only You Can Prevent Cloud Data Loss

Cloud Conversations Aws Ebs Glacier And S3 Overview Part I

Cloud Conversations Confidence Certainty And Confidentiality

Cloud Conversations Azure Aws Service Maps

Aws S3 Storage Gateway Revisited Part

Cloud Conversations Aws S3 Cross Region Replication Storage Enhancements

Cloud Conversations Aws Ebs Glacier And S3 Overview Part Ii S3

Aws Announces S3 Cloud Storage Security Encryption Features

Fixing Windows 10 1709 Post Upgrade Restart Loop

Microsoft September 2017 Software Defined Data Infrastructure Updates

Nvme Wont Replace Flash Complement

Intel Micron Unveil New 3d Xpoint Nvm For Servers Storage

Answer Nvme Questions

Gaining Industry Traction Adoption

Industry Adoption Vs Industry Deployment Is There A Difference

Seven Databases In Seven Weeks A Book Review Of Nosql Databases

Hpe Announces Amd Powered Gen 10 Proliant Dl385 Software Defined Workloads

August 2017 Sddi Update Newsletter

Backyard Black Bears Stillwater St Croix River Valley

Story Stadiums Along Seismic Activity

Side Slbs Serverless Bs Software Hardware Fud

Standing Tall Proud September 11 2001 Forget

Participate In Top Vblog 2016 Voting Now

Cloud Constellation Spacebelt Out Of This World Cloud Data Centers

Water Data Storage Analogy

S3motion Buckets Containers Objects Aws S3 Cloud Emccode

Server Storage Io Cables Connectors Chargers Geek Gifts

Storageio Out And About Update Vmworld 2014

Happy Earth Day 2016 Eliminating Digital Data Ewaste

Green And Virtual Data Center Primer

Green Virtual Data Center Productive Economical Efficient Effective Flexible

Green And Virtual Data Center Links

Part Ii Geek2014

Data Center Sustainability Convergence Zone

June 2013 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Epa Energy Star Data Center Storage Draft Specification Review

Web Chat Thur 30th Hot Storage Trends 2013

Spring Snw 2013 Storage Networking World Recap

Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Related Links

Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Related Links 2

Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Related Links 3

Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Related Links 4

Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Related Links 5

Data Centers Trade Show Exhibit Infrastructure Granted

Family Intel Xeon Scalable Processors Enable Software Defined Data Infrastructures Sddi Sddc

Azure Stack Technical Preview 3 Tp3 Overview Preview Review

Broadcom Aka Avago Aka Lsi Announces Sas Sata Nvme Adapters Raid

Pace Your Server Storage Io Decision Making Its About Application Requirements

More Data Footprint Reduction Dfr Material

Revisiting Raid Remains Relevant Resources Context Matters

Preparing World Backup Day 2017 Prepared

Data Storage Tape Update V2014 Alive

Server Storageio August 2016 Update Newsletter

Farley Flies Into Snw Spring 2013

Talking With Tony Dicenzo At Snw Spring 2013

Dave Demming Talking Tech Education Snw Fall 2012

Amazon Web Service Aws September 2017 Software Defined Data Infrastructure Updates

Dell Emc Vmware September 2017 Software Defined Data Infrastructure Updates

September 2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Update Newsletter

July 2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructures Update Newsletter

2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructures Update Newsletter

Pcie Fundamentals Server Storage Io

Emc Dell Emc Part Dell Technologies Updates

Vmware Vsan V66 Part Vsan Evolution Summary

Dell Emc World 2017 Day News Announcement Summary

Getting Caught Happened September 2017

February 2017 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Gdpr Effect 25 2018 Ready

Part Iii Focus Expands Data Protection Action

Backup Big Data Big Data Protection Cmg Tom Becchetti Podcast

Data Infrastructure Data Center Software Defined Management Dashboard Tools

Zombie Technology Life Death Tape Alive

Cloud Bulk Object Storage Fundamentals

Nvme Overview And Primer Part I

Nvme Ssd Game Intel 750

Part Ii Nvme Overview And Primer Different Configurations

Part Iii Nvme Overview And Primer Need For Performance Speed

Part Iv Nvme Overview And Primer Where And How To Use Nvme

Part V Nvme Overview And Primer Where To Learn More What This All Means

Server Storage Io Benchmark Workload Scripts Part

Part Ii Server Storage Io Benchmark Workload Scripts Results

Politics And Storage Or Storage In An Election Year V2008

Sherwood Becomes Atrato

Updated Look And Feel

Chargeback For Storage

Beware Of Announcements On April 1st

Im Leaving On A Jet Plane

Links To Upcoming And Recent Webcasts And Videocasts

Off To Snw In Dallas For The Day

Poll Whats Your Take On Windows 7

Update Energystar For Server Workshop

Emc And Cisco Acadia Vce What Does It Mean

Moving Beyond The Benchmark Brouhaha

Snw Spring 2008 Audio And Podcasts

Presentation Downloads From Storage Decisions New York 2008

Us Epa Energystar For Servers Wants To Hear From You

Upcoming Event Industry Trends And Perspective European Seminar

Could Huawei Buy Brocade

Back From Fall 2008 Snw In Dallas

Another Storageio Appearance On Storage Monkeys Infosmack

Atrato Part Deux

Updated Look And Feel Part Deux

Summer Dog Days

My How Time Flys By

Missing Dedupe Debate Detail

Trick Or Treat Either Way Be Safe

Storage Performance Council Releases Component Spc 1c And Spc 2c Results

Happy Earth Day 2008

Something You May Not See Everyday

The Function Of Xaasx Pick A Letter

Recent Storageio Media Coverage And Comments

The Many Faces Of Solid State Devicesdisks Ssd

Snw Spring 2008

Downloads For Fall 2008 San Francisco Storage Decisions Now Available

On The Road Again An Update

Dutch Storageexpo Recap

Worried About It Ma Here Come The New Startups

Out And About Update Off To Vmworld Next Week

Visit My New Amazon Authors Page

Upcoming Out And About Events

Happy Labor Day V2 009

Storageio Aka Greg Schulz Appears On Infosmack

Storageio Debuts At 79 In Technobabble Top 400 Analyst List

Going Rouge In It

Poll What Was Hot In 2009 And What Was Not Cast Your Vote

Upcoming Events And Activities Update V2010 1

Epa Server And Storage Workshop Feb 2 2010

Networking With Bruce Ravid And Bruce Rave

Practical Email Optimization And Archiving Strategies

Why Vasa Is Important To Have In Your Vmware Casa

Convergence People Processes Polices And Products

Cloud Virtualization And Storage Networking Conversations

New Seagate Momentus Xt Hybrid Drive Ssd And Hdd

Top 2011 Cloud Virtualization Storage And Networking Posts

A Conversation From Snw 2011 With Jenny Hamel

2012 Industry Trends Perspectives And Commentary Predictions

Should You Feel Sorry For Revenue Prevention Departments

Top Storageio Cloud Virtualization Networking And Data Protection Posts

Can I Ask For Your Support Please Vote For My Blog

Is 14 4tbytes Of Data Storage For 52503 A Good Deal It Depends

Are Large Storage Arrays Dead At The Hands Of Ssd

Is Ssd Dead No However Some Vendors Might Be

More Storage Io Momentus Hhdd And Ssd Moments Part Ii

What Is The Best Kind Of Io The One You Do Not Have To Do

How Much Ssd Do You Need Vs Want

Various Cloud Virtualization Server Storage Io Polls

3rd Of July Fireworks Grand Finale Video

Dell Is Buying Quest Software Not The Phone Company Qwest

Dell Storage Customer Advisory Panel Cap

Epa Energy Star For Data Center Storage Draft 3 Specification

Kudos To Lenovo Customer Service Redefined Or Re Established

What Does New Emc And Lenovo Partnership Mean

What Are Some Endangered It Species

Over 1000 Entries Now On The Storageio Industry Links Page

Cloud Conversations Aws Government Cloud Govcloud

Who Will Be Winner With Oracle 10 Million Dollar Challenge

Cloud Virtualization Storage And Networking In An Election Year

Technology Buying Do You Decide On G2 Or Gq

Raid And Iops And Io Observations

Trick Or Treat And Vendor Fun Games

Industry Trends And Perspectives Snw 2012 Rapping With Dave Raffo Of Searchstorage

Industry Trends And Perspectives Ray Lucchesi On Storage And Snw

Industry Trends And Perspectives Catching Up With Quantum Cte David Chapa

Industry Trends And Perspectives Snw 2012 Waynes World

Industry Trends And Perspectives Chatting With Karl Chen At Snw 2012

Industry Trends And Perspectives Learning With Leo Leger Of Snia

Industry Trends And Perspectives Meeting Up With Marty Foltyn Of Snia

Have Ssds Been Unsuccessful With Storage Arrays With Poll

Little Data Big Data And Very Big Data Vbd Or Big Bs

Data Center Infrastructure Management Dcim And Irm

Is Ssd Only For Performance

Ssd Flash And Dram Dejavu Or Something New

Thanks For Viewing Storageio Content And Top 2012 Viewed Posts

Summary Emc Vmax 10k High End Storage Systems Stayin Alive

Cloud Conversations Public Private Hybrid And Community Clouds Part Ii

Hardware Software What About Valueware

Cloud Virtualization Storage Io Trends For 2013 And Beyond

Vote For Top 2013 Vblogs Thanks For Your Continued Support

Conversation With Justin Stottlemyer Of Shutterfly And Object Storage Discussion

Snias New Spdecon Conference

Snia Spring 2013 Update With Wayne Adams

Speaking Of Ssds With Poll

Io Io Its Off To Virtual Work And Vmworld I Go Or Went

Blame It On The Un In Nyc This Week

Trick Or Treat Have You Seen Any It Frankenstacks

Cloud And Travel Fun

Some Alternative And Fun Cloud Api Meanings

Emcworld 2012 Tust And Marketing Can They Coexist

Iod Iot Ioe Ios Iop Iou Iox Future

Storage Decisions Spring 2009 Sessions Update

Removing Complexity Cost Drive Return Innovation Roi

Storageio Industry Links Page Updated 1200 Entries

School School Current Future School 2

Ivmcontrol Iphone Vmware Management Itool Itoy

Lenovo Ts140 Server Storage Io Review

Aws Adds Zocalo Enterprise File Sync Share Collaboration

Vmware Vvols And Storage Io Fundementals Part 2

Docker Smarties Nondummies Vmworld 2014

Server Storage Io Networking Virtualization Cloud Scaling

Remember The Alamo

Do You Have Your Copy Of The Green And Virtual Data Center Yet

Green It Deferral Blamed On Economic Recession Might Be Result Of Green Gap

Just For Fun Roses Are Red

Snw And Other Conferences Want And Need You

R U Twittering Yet

More Storage Io Momentus Hhdd And Ssd Moments Part I

Ssd And Green It Moving Beyond Green Washing

Io Io How Well Do You Know About Good Or Bad Server And Storage Ios

In The Data Center Or Information Factory Not Everything Is The Same

Cloud Conversations Public Private Hybrid What About Community Clouds

Data Protection Modernization More Than Swapping Out Media

Modernizing Data Protection With Certainty

Trick Or Treat 2011 It Zombie Technology Poll

Is There An Information Or Data Recession Are You Using Less Storage With Polls

Spring 2014 Storageio Events Activities Update

Seagate Shipped 10 Million Hhdds Lot

Revisiting Reinvent 2014 Aws News

Data Protection Diaries Are Your Restores Ready For World Backup Day 2015

How To Test Your Hdd Ssd Or All Flash Array Afa Storage Fundamentals

Introducing Us Hr2454 Waxman Markey Climate Bill

Cloud And Virtual Data Storage Networking Now On Kindle

Modernizing Data Protection Ways

Storageio In The News Update V2010 1

Ibm Speed Of Light Energy Saving Or Speed Of Light Green Marketing

Amazon Web Services Aws And The Netflix Fix

Spring 2008 Storage Descisions Wrap Up

Why Ssd Based Arrays And Storage Appliances Can Be A Good Idea Part Ii

Director Dinner Discussions Of The San Kind

Hello From Emc World Bloggers Lounge

Going Dutch And Other Spring Spring 2012 Storageio Activities

Storageio Going Dutch And Deutsch Fall 2012

Some August 2015 Amazon Web Services Aws And Microsoft Azure Cloud Updates

What Am I Hearing And Seeing While Out And About

Work And Entertainment From Coast To Coast

Snia Announces Cloud Data Management Initiative Cdmi V1 1

Storage Magazine In A Virtual World

Dude Dell Is Getting Buying An Emc And Vmware Deal

Check Out These Top 50 It Blogs 3

It Optimization Efficiency Convergence And Cloud Conversations From Snw

Usenix Fast File Storage Technologies 2014 Conference Proceedings

Putting Some Vmware Esx Storage Tips Together Part Ii

Out And About Update

Part Ii Seagate 1200 12gbs Enterprise Sas Ssd Storgeio Lab Review

Ben Woo On Big Data Buzzword Bingo And Business Benefits

Declared Dead Fibre Channel Continues Evolve Fcbb6

Getting Caught Up Its Been A Busy Year

Airport Parking Tiered Storage And Latency

Green Data Storage And Server Io Topics

Introducing Josh Apter And The Padcaster From Nab 2013

Amazon Cloud Storage Options Enhanced With Glacier

Software Defined Virtual Hard Disk Vhd

Ibm Vs Oracle Nad Intervenes Again

Vmware Announces Vsphere V6 Virtualization Technologies

Server And Storage Io Benchmarking 101 For Smarties

Cloud Conversations Focused Cost Missing Cloud Opportunities

Logo Ology

If March 31st Is Backup Day Dont Be Fooled With Restore On April 1st

The Blame Game Does Cloud Storage Result In Data Loss

Commentary On Clouds Storage Networking Green It And Other Topics

Future Ethernet 2016 Roadmap Released Ethernet Alliance

Brocade To Buy Foundry Networks Prelude To Upcoming Converged Ethernet Battle

Podcast Vbrownbags Vforums And Vmware Vtraining With Alastair Cooke

Snw Fall 2011 Revisited And Snia Emerald Program

Goodbye 2013 2014 Predictions Present Future

March And Mileage Mania Wrap Up

Was Today The Proverbal Day That He Froze Over

Something For Free From Vmware Other Than Your Time

Speaking Of Speeding Up Business With Ssd Storage

Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Go In The Water Again

What Industry Pundits Love And Loathe About Data Storage

Lenovo Thinkserver Td340 Storageio Lab Review

Fall 2015 Server Storage Io Cloud Virtual Seminars Dutch

Networking Convergence Ethernet Infiniband Or Both

Data Storage Innovation Chat Snia Wayne Adams David

My Server And Storage Io Holiday Break Projects

Vmware Vcloud Air Server Storageiolab Test Drive With Videos

More Modernizing Data Protection Virtualization And Clouds With Certainty

Congratulations Imation And Nexsan Are There Any Independent Storage Vendors Left

Cloud Conversations Aws Efs Elastic File System Cloud Nas Preview

Does Dell Have A Cloudy Cloud Strategy Story Part Ii

Infosmack Episode 34 Vmware Microsoft And More

Nad Recommends Oracle Discontinue Certain Exadata Performance Claims

Vmware Buys Virsto Is It About Storage Hypervisors

Part Ii Focus Expands Data Protection

Hps Big December 3rd Storage Announcement

Did Hp Respond To Emc And Cisco Vce With Microsoft Hyperv Bundle

Plenty Of Industry Firsts At Vmworld Europe

Ibm Mainframe Part Deux

California Center For Sustainable Energy Ccse

Help Save A Life

Congratulations To Ibm For Releasing Xiv Spc Results

Storageio Books Added To Intel Recommended Reading Lists

Collecting Transaction Minute Sql Server Hammerdb

Time For Top Vblog Voting V2015 Its It Award Season Cast Your Votes

Award Season Time 2014 Top Vmware Virtualization Blog Voting

525 Media Bay Add 25 12 Gbps Sas Sata Drives Server

Aws Amazon Storage Gateway First Second And Third Impressions

More Storage And Io Metrics That Matter

Snow Birds

The Human Face Of Big Data A Book Review

Netapp On Rough Ground Or A Diamond In The Rough

Data Protection Gumbo Protect Preserve Serve Information

Rip Windows Sis Single Instance Storage Or At Least In Server 2016

Ubuntu 16 04 Lts Aka Xenial Xerus Whats In The Bits And Bytes

Securing Information Assets Data Storage

Mirror Mirror On The Wall Whos The Greenest Of Them All

Missing Mh370 Remind Digital Assets

Hardware Sas Sata Nvm M2 Software Vhd Defined Odds Ends

Focus Expands Data Protection Backup Staying Alive

Odds And Ends Getting Caught Up News And Other Updates

Ceph Day In Amsterdam And Stage Weil On Object Storage

Emcworld 2016 Getting Started On Dell Emc

Emcworld 2015 How Do You Want Your Storage Wrapped

How Can Direct Attached Storage Das Make A Comeback If It Never Left

Ssd Past Present And Future With Jim Handy

Announcing Sas Sans For Dummies Book Lsi Edition

Recent Tips Videos Articles And More

Vmware Vvols And Storage Io Fundementals

Two Companies On Parallel Tracks Moving Like Trains Offset By Time Emc And Netapp

Big Files Lots File Processing Benchmarking Vdbench

Server Storage Io Benchmarking Tools Microsoft Diskspd Part

Data Protection Diaries World Backup Day March 31 Restore Data Test Time

Part Ii Iops Hdd Hhdd Ssd

Ceph Day Amsterdam 2012 Object And Cloud Storage

Mr Backup Curtis Preston Goes Back To Ceph School

Emc Dssd D5 Rack Scale Shared Direct Attached Ssd All Flash Array Part I

Part Ii Emc Dssd D5 Direct Attached Shared Afa

Blog Roll Dj Vu And Storage Monkeys

Give Hp Storage Some Love And Short Strokin

Vce Revisited Now Zen

Funeral For A Friend

April 2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructure Update Newsletter

Vmware Vsan V6 6 Part Ii Just Speeds Feeds Please

Introducing Vsan 6 6 Hyper Converged Hci Software Defined Data Infrastructure

Vmware Vsan V66 Part Iii Reducing Cost Complexity

Vmware Vsan V6 6 Part Iv Scaling Robo Data Centers Today

Cisco Gen 32gb Fibre Channel Nvme San Updates

Kevin Closson Discusses Slob Server Cpu Io Database Performance Benchmarks

Congratulations Returning Fellow Vexperts 2017

Sdx Summit London Uk Planning Enabling Journey Software Defined

Ssd Flash Nonvolatile Memory Nvm Storage Trends Tips Topics

Cloud Object Storage Future Questions

Updated Software Defined Data Infrastructure Webinars Fall 2016 Events

Value Infrastructure Insight Enabling Informed Decision Making

Software Defined Data Infrastructure School Webinar Fall 2016 Events

12gb Sas Ssd Enabling Server Storage Io Performance Effectiveness

Netapp Announces Ontap 9 Software Defined Storage Management

Going Dutch Seminars And Workshops In Holland June 2016

Enabling Bitlocker On Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit

Tape Is Still Alive Or At Least In Conversations And Discussions

Comptia Input Storage Certification

Vmware Cisco Emc Vce Zen

It And Storage Economics 101 Supply And Demand

Part Ii Revisting Aws S3 Storage Gateway Test Drive Deployment

It And Technology Turkeys

Emc Vmax 10k Looks Like High End Storage Systems Are Still Alive Part Ii

Part Ii Lenovo Ts140 Server Storage Io Review

Recent Tips Videos Articles And More Update V2010 1

Industry Trends And Perspectives Thoughts On Ipad For Business

Volatile Memory Nvm Nvme Flash Memory Summit Ssd Updates

April 2015 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Researchers And Marketers Dont Agree On Future Of Nand Flash Ssd

Emc Vfcache Respinning Ssd And Intelligent Caching Part I

Why Ssd Based Arrays And Storage Appliances Can Be A Good Idea Part I

Ibm Buys Flash Solid State Device Ssd Industry Veteran Tms

Cloud Conversations Gaining Cloud Confidence From Insights Into Aws Outages Part Ii

January 2015 Server Storageio Newsletter

Computer Data Storage Complex Depends

December 2014 Server Storageio Newsletter

Diy Converged Server Software Defined Storage Budget Lenovo Ts140

Server Storageio December 2015 Update Newsletter

November 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

February 2015 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

July 2015 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

March 2015 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

August Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Server Storageio October 2015 Update Newsletter

Server Storage Io Network Benchmark Winter Olympic Games

Enterprise Sshd And Flash Ssd Part Of An Enterprise Tiered Storage Strategy

Microsoft Diskspd Part Ii Server Storage Io Benchmark Tools

September October 2014 Server And Storageio Update Newsletter

Seagate 1200 12gbs Enterprise Sas Ssd Server Storgeio Lab Review

Microsoft Windows Server Azure Nano Life Cycle Updates

Server Storage Io Intel Nuc Nick Knack Notes Impressions

Emcworld 2016 Emc Hybrid And Converged Clouds Your Way

Server Storageio 2016 Update Newsletter

Server Storageio Industry Trends Perspectives Report Wekaio Matrix

Data Quantum Revenues Continue Grow

Chelsio Storage Ip Networks Enable Data Infrastructures

Post Holiday It Shopping Bargains Dell Buying Exanet

Predictions Did Mayans Have It Right Or Did We Read It Wrong

Overview Review Microsoft Refs Reliable File System

Gaining Server Storage Io Insight Microsoft Windows Server 2016

How Many Degrees Separate You And Your Information

Inaugural Storageio Newsletter

Spring 2010 Storageio Newsletter

Storage Comments From The Field And Customers In The Trenches

Virtual Storage And Social Media What Did Emc Not Announce

Are Social Media And Networking A Waste Of Time

Congratulations To New And Returning 2012 Vmware Vexperts

Hitting The Road Again

It Feels Like Grand Central Station Here

Storageio Outlines Intelligent Power Management And Maid 20 Storage Techniques Advocates New Technologies To Address Modern Data Center Energy Concerns

Trains Going Green Ah Well Maybe Blue

Happy Earth Day 2009

Mirror Mirror On The Wall Who Is The Greenest Of Them All

Green Virtual Servers Storage And Networking 2008 Beijing Olympics

Hot Storage Topics Converge On Chicago Next Week

John Carpenters Escape From New York Back From Storage Decisions Ny 2008

Does Dell Have A Cloudy Cloud Strategy Story Part I

Dell Updates Storage Center Operating System 7 Scos 7

Lenovo Buys Ibms Xseries Aka X86 Server Business Emc

Cloud And Virtual Data Storage Networking Book Vmworld 2011 Debut

Cloud And Virtual Data Storage Networking Book Released

Server Storageio September 2015 Update Newsletter

Some Windows Server Storage Io Related Commands

Server Storageio November 2015 Update Newsletter

Dell Emc Azure Stack Hybrid Cloud Solution

Msp Business Journal Names Greg Schulz An Eco Tech Warrior

Continuing Education And Refresher Time Raid And Luns

Many Different Implementations Of Raid

Wide World Of Archiving Life Beyond Compliance

Comfort Zones Stating What Might Be Obvious To Some

The Differences Between Singapore And Houston In May

Do Disk Based Vtls Draw Less Power Than Tape

More On Fibre Channel Over Ethernet Fcoe

Green Hype Or Reality

Thank You Gartner For Generating Awareness For My New Book

Why Xiv Is So Important To Ibms Storage Business

Das Sas Fcoe Green Efficient Storage And Io Podcast Faqs

Cmg Enabling The Green And Virtual Data Center

It Belt Tightening And Stratigies For It Economic Sustainment

Vendors Who Dont Want To Be Virtualized

Did Someone Forget To Tell Dell That Tape Is Dead

Ssd Activity Continues To Go Virtually Round And Round

All Work And No Play Ok How About An Education Half Day

Industry Trend And Perspective Seagate Changes Disk Drive Warranties

Just For Fun Of Flying

Raid Data Protection Remains Relevant

Protecting And Storing Personal Digital Documents

Is There Still Innovation For It And Storage

Io Virtualization Iov Revisited

Shifting Industry Trend From Purchase To Leasing

Is There A Data And Io Activity Recession

Us Epa Looking For Industry Input On Energy Star For Storage

Shifting From Energy Avoidance To Energy Efficiency

Ibm Out Oracle In As Buyer Of Sun

Us Epa Energy Star For Server Update

Data Center Io Bottlenecks Performance Issues And Impacts

Clarifying Clustered Storage Confusion

Green It Confusion Continues Opportunities Missed

Clouds Are Like Electricity Dont Be Scared

Hp Buys One Of The Seven Networking Dwarfs And Gets A Bargain

Should Everything Be Virtualized

Optimize Data Storage For Performance And Capacity Efficiency

Justifying Green It And Home Hardware Upgrades With Energystar

How To Win Approval For Upgrades Link Them To Business Benefits

What Is The Future Of Servers

Ssd And Storage System Performance

Green It And Virtual Data Centers

Emc Storage And Management Software Getting Fast

Its Us Census Time What About It Data Centers

Nas Nasa And Nascar Do They Have Anything In Common

Is Maid Dead I Dont Think So

Happy Earth Day 2010

Who Or What Is Your Sphere Of Influence

Apple Ipad Is It A Business Itool Or Itoy

Cloud Conversations Nirvanix Shutdown Caused Cloud Confidence Concerns

Industry Trends And Perspectives Raid Rebuild Rates

Industry Trends And Perspectives Storage Virtualization And Virtual Storage

Industry Trends And Perspectives Converged Networking And Io Virtualization Iov

Industry Trends And Perspectives Tiered Storage Systems And Mediums

Initial Virtumania Appearance Episode 14 With Fellow Vexperts

Industry Trends And Perspectives Tiered Hypervisors And Microsoft Hyperv

Vmware Vexpert 2010 Thank You Im Honored To Be Named A Member

Industry Trends And Perspectives Blog Series

My Favorite Late Summer Reading Material

Supreme Court Rules Sarbox Intact Oversight Board Changes

While Hp And Dell Make Counter Bids Exclusive Interview With 3par Ceo David Scott

End To End E2e Systems Resource Analysis Sra For Cloud And Virtual Environments

Has Fcoe Entered The Trough Of Disillusionment

What Is Dfr Or Data Footprint Reduction

Santas It Elf Limited Time Discount

What Do You Do When Your Service Provider Drops The Ball

Green It Goes Mainstream What About Data Storage Environments

Storageio Momentus Hybrid Hard Disk Drive Hhdd Moments

Buzzword Bingo 1 0 Are You Ready For Fall Product Announcemnts

Happy Holidays 2010

What Have I Been Doing This Winter

What Do Vars And Clouds As Well As Msps Have In Common

What Do You Need When Its Time To Buy A New Server

Securing Data At Rest Self Encrypting Disks Seds

Buzzword Bingo And Acronym Update V2 011

Happy Earth Day 2011

The Data Storage Prayer

Cloud And Virtual Data Storage Networking

Cloud Storage Dont Be Scared However Look Before You Leap

Storageio Going Dutch Seminar For Storage And Io Professionals

Seagate Kinetic Cloud Object Storage Io Platform

Summer Greetings And Happy Holidays V2011

Industry Trend People Plus Data Are Aging And Living Longer

Dell Storage Forum 2011 Revisited

Storageio Going Dutch Again October 2011 Seminar For Storage Professionals

Time In And Around Clouds

Congratulations To Infosmack On Episode 100

Industry Trends And Perspectives Public And Private It Clouds

Dude Is Dell Going To Buy Brocade

Spring May 2012 Storageio News Letter

Data Migration Tips

Cloud Conversation Thanks Gartner For Saying What Has Been Said

December 2012 Storageio Update News Letter

January 2013 Server And Storageio Update Newsletter

Behind The Scenes Santa Claus Global Cloud Story

Emc Vmax 10k Looks Like High End Storage Systems Are Still Alive Part Iii

Many Faces Of Storage Hypervisor Virtual Storage Or Storage Virtualization

February 2013 Server And Storageio Update Newsletter

Xtremio Xtremsw And Xtremsf Emc Flash Ssd Portfolio Redefined

Some Things Keep Going Around Seagate Ships 2 Billion Hdds

Where Has The Fcoe Hype And Fud Gone With Poll

A Pivotal Or Cloudy Moment For Emc And Vmware

March Metrics And Measuring Social Media

Are Your Analyst Blogger Media Or Press Requests Being Read

March 2013 Server And Storageio Update Newsletter

Pressure Cooker Good

Hp Moonshot 1500 Software Defined Capable Compute Servers

Netapp And Akorri An E2e Cross Technology Domain Sra Play

Full Rss Archive Feeds Are Now Available For Storageioblog

2013 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Morning Summer Storms Walking Midwest

Ibm Buys Softlayer Software Defined Infrastructures Clouds

Upgrading Lenovo X1 Windows 7 Samsung 840 Ssd

Geek Gadgets Kill A Watt Meter

Green Storage Practical Ways To Reduce Power Consumption

Data Proteciton For Virtual Environments At Vmware Vmworld

From Ilm To Iim Is This A Solution Sell Looking For A Problem

Industry Trends And Perspectives Tape Disk And Dedupe Coexistence

Ilm Has It Losts Its Meaning

Is Ibm Xiv Still Relevant

Data Proteciton For Virtual Environments

Spc And Storage Benchmarking Games

Server And Storage Virtualization Life Beyond Consolidation

Epa Draft 3 Of Energy Star For Computer Server Specification

Cloud Virtual Server Storage Io Technology Tiering

Disruptive Updates

Virtual Cloud Availability Shared Responsibility Common Sense

Storage Performance

Will 6gb Sas Kill Fibre Channel

Poll Whats Do You Think Of It Clouds

Closing The Green Gap Green Washing May Be Endangered However Addressing Real Green Issues Is Here To Stay

Catch Of The Day Or Post Of The Day

Availability Or Lack There Of Lessons From Our Frail Aging Infrastructure

Cisco Wins Fcoe Pre Season And Primaries Now For The Main Event

Power Cooling Floor Space Environmental Pcfe And Green Metrics

Tape Talk Changing Role Of Tape

Sas Disk Drives Appearing In Larger Mid Range Arrays

Blog Post March Metric Madness Fun With Simple Math

Hard Product Vs Soft Product

Optical Storage Oppourtunities Or Obsolence

Storage Efficiency And Optimization The Other Green

Smb Capacity Planning Focusing On Energy Conservation

Whats Your Take On Ftc Guidelines For Bloggers

Technology And Traveling

Clouds And Data Loss Time For Cdp Commonsense Data Protection

Epa Energy Star For Data Center Storage Update 2

From Bits To Bytes Decoding Encoding

Industry Trends And Perspectives 6gb Sas And Das Are Not Dumb A Storage

As The Hard Disk Drive Hdd Continues To Spin

Another Storageio Hybrid Momentus Moment

Cloud Conversations Aws Ebs Optimized Instances

Unified Storage Systems Showdown Netapp Fas Vs Emc Vnx

April 2013 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Cloud Conversations Aws Ebs Glacier And S3 Overview Part Iii

Part Ii Ibm Server Side Storage Io Ssd Flash Cache Software

Are Hard Disk Drives Hdds Getting To Big

2011 Summer Momentus Hybrid Hard Disk Drive Hhdd Moment

Measuring Windows Performance Impact For Vdi Planning

Getting Sasy The Other Shared Storage Option For Disk And Ssd Systems

Supporting It Growth Demand During Economic Uncertain Times

Inaugural Ssd Show

Care Coraid Content Conversation

Wd Buys Nand Flash Ssd Storage Io Cache Vendor Virident

Depends

Fall 2013 Dutch Cloud Virtual Storage Io Seminars

Data Footprint Reduction Part 2 Dell Ibm Ocarina And Storwize

Fall 2010 Storageio News Letter

Spring 2011 Server And Storageio News Letter

Winter 2011 Server And Storageio News Letter

Summer 2011 Storageio News Letter

A Storage Io Momentus Moment

Part Ii Emc Announces Xtremio General Availability

Fall December 2011 Storageio News Letter

Merry Christmas Seasons Happy Holidays 2013 Server Storageio

Fusionio Fio Ssd Vendor Ceo Flash Whats

Server Virtualization Nested Tiered Hypervisors

Book Review Rethinking Enterprise Storage Microsoftstorsimple Marc Farley

Kudos To Hp Ceo Mark Hurd For Dignity To Step Down From His Post

Dell Inspiron 660 Virtual Diamond Rough

August 2010 Storageio News Letter

Small Medium Business Smb Continues Gain Respect Soho

Using Removable Hard Disk Drives Rhdds

Storage Bridge Bay Sbb Industry Group Update

Emc Announces Xtremio General Availability Part

Emc Evolves Enterprise Data Protection Enhancements Part

Raid Extend Life Nand Flash Ssd

Fall 2013 Aws Cloud Storage Compute Enhancements

Emc Vplex Virtual Storage Redefined Or Respun

The Other Green Storage Efficiency And Optimization

Is Fcoe Struggling To Gain Traction Or On A Normal Adoption Course

Big Fish And Small Fish Fish Story Or The One That Did Not Get Away

Side Context Iops

Part Ii Revisiting Reinvent 2014 And Other Aws Updates

Summer 2013 Server And Storageio Update Newsletter

Dell Will Buy Someone However Not Brocade At Least For Now

Happy Thanks Giving 2010

June 2010 Storageio Newsletter

What Records Will Emc Break In Nyc January 18 2011

Smb Soho And Low End Nas Gaining Enterprise Features

Gregs Storageio Out And About Update June 2010

Vmware Vsphere V5 And Storage Drs

Storage Effiency And Optimizaiton Balancing Time And Space

Pue Are You Managing Power Energy Or Productivity

Emc Vnx Mcx Storage Io Work

The New Green Gaining Realistic Economic Efficiencys Now

Closing The Green Gap Wsradio Internet Radio Interview

Determining Computer Or Server Energy Use

Epa Energy Star For Data Center Storage Update

Saving Money With Green It Time To Invest In Information Factories

Webcast E2e Awareness And Insight For It Environments

Ibm Server Side Storage Io Ssd Flash Cache Software

Part Ii Emc Evolves Enterprise Data Protection Enhancements

Cisco Buys Whiptail Continuing Storage Storage Io Flash Cash Cache Dash

Fall 2013 Storageio Update Newsletter

Raid Relevance Revisited

Have You Heard Of 2drs Data Protection Technology

July 2010 Odds And Ends Perspectives Tips And Articles

Has Ssd Put Hard Disk Drives Hdds On Endangered Species List

Seagate Proof Life Enterprise Hdd Enhancements

Seagate To Say Goodbye To Cayman Islands Hello Ireland

Cloud Conversations Gaining Cloud Confidence From Insights Into Aws Outages

Have Vtls Or Vxls Become Zombies Declared Dead Yet Still Alive

Tiered Communication And Media Venues

Are You On The Storageio It Data Infrastructure Industry Links Page

Green Storage Is Alive And Well Energy Star Enterprise Storage Stakeholder Meeting Details

Tape Talk Time

Back To School Dedupe School

Storageio V20 11 2011 Events Seminars And Web Casts Schedule

Getting Caught Up And Holiday Shopping

Performance Availability Storageioblog Featured Itke Guest Blog

The New Green It Efficient Effective Smart And Productive

Dude Is Dell Doing A Disk Deal Again With Compellent

Intelligent Power Management Ipm And Second Generation Maid 20 On The Rise

2010 And 2011 Trends Perspectives And Predictions More Of The Same

Mainframe Cmg Virtualization Storage And Zombie Technologies

Vmworld 2010 Virtual Roads Clouds And Inxs Devil Inside

Green Power And Cooling Tools And Calculators

Green It Green Gap Tiered Energy And Green Myths

Vmworld 2013 Vmware Server Storage Io Networking Update Day 1

Part Ii Xtremio Xtremsw And Xtremsf Emc Flash Ssd Portfolio Redefined

Datadynamics Storagex 70 File Data Management Migration Software

Whats Your Take On Open Virtualization Alliance And Vmware

September October Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Server Storageio June July 2016 Update Newsletter

Open Data Center Alliance Odca Bmw Private Cloud Strategy

Happy 20th Birthday Microsoft Windows Server Get Ready Windows Server 2016

Server Storageio March 2016 Update Newsletter

Netapp Ef540 Something Familiar Something New

Data Footprint Reduction Part 1 Life Beyond Dedupe And Changing Data Lifecycles

Emc Vipr Software Defined Object Storage Part Ii

Emc Vipr Software Defined Object Storage Part Iii

Emc Vipr Virtual Physical Object Software Defined Storage Sds

Breaking Vmware Esxi 55 Acpi Boot Loop Lenovo Td350

Storageio In The News

Summer Book Update And Back To School Reading

February 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

November 2013 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Matt Vogt Computex Talks Vmware Vcops Podcast

August 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

July 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Storage Virtualization In Band Vs Out Of Band Debates To Be Resurrected

Snow Fun And Information Technology They Do Mix

Technology Tiering Servers Storage And Snow Removal

Netapp Buying Lsis Engenio Storage Business Unit

Summer Weddings Emcdatadomain And Hpibrix

Server Storage Io Intel Nuc Nick Knack Notes Second Impressions

Emc Vfcache Respinning Ssd And Intelligent Caching Part Ii

Hds Claus Mikkelsen Talking Storage Snw Fall 2012

How To Write Publish And Promote A Book Or Blog

Oracle Xsigo Vmware Nicira Sdn And Iov Io Io Its Off To Work They Go

Open Data Center Alliance Odca Publishes Two New Cloud Usage Models

Nand Flash Sata Ssd Ddr3 Dimm Slot

Server Storageio February 2016 Update Newsletter

Server Storageio January 2016 Update Newsletter

June 2017 Server Storageio Data Infrastructures Update Newsletter

Ibms Storwize Or Wise Storage The V7000 And Dfr

Re Visiting If Ibm Xiv Is Still Relevant With V7000

Part I Puresystems Something Old Something New Something From Big Blue

Part V Puresystems Something Old Something New Something From Big Blue

Part Iv Puresystems Something Old Something New Something From Big Blue

Part Ii Puresystems Something Old Something New Something From Big Blue

Microsoft Azure Cloud Software Defined Data Infrastructure Reference Architecture Resources

Happy 100th Birthday Or Anniversary Wishes

Azure Stack Tp3 Overview Preview Review Part Ii

Data Protection Diaries Data Protection

March2014 Storageio Newsletter Cisco Cloud Vmware Vsan

June 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Chat With Cash Coleman Talking Cleardb Cloud Database And Johnny Cash

April 2014 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Acadia Vce Vmware Cisco Emc Virtual Computing Environment

Storageio Spring Keynote And Speaking Tour V2008

Server Storageio April 2016 Update Newsletter

Cloud Conversations Loss Of Data Access Vs Data Loss

Hpe Buying Server Storage Io Data Infrastructures

January 2017 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Top Vblog 2017 Voting Open

Data Infrastructure Tradecraft Trends

Converged Ci Hyperconverged Hci Mean Storage Io

Popular Viewed Storageioblog Posts 2016

March 2017 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Top Storage World Decade

Back To School Shopping Dude Dell Digests 3par Disk Storage

Does Ibm Power7 Processor Announcement Signal Storage Upgrades

Do You Know Hds Or What It Means

Is The New Hds Vsp Really The Mvsp

Hds Mid Summer Storage Converged Compute Enhancements

Object Storage News Trends Cloud Bulk Storage

Hds Buys Bluearc Any Surprises Here

June 2015 Server Storageio Update Newsletter

Server Storageio Holiday Seasons 2016

Do Software Vendors Eliminate Or Move Location Of Vendor Lock In

Vendor Lockin Responsibiity

Spam Of A Different Kind

Part Iii Puresystems Something Old Something New Something From Big Blue

Emc Vmax 10k Looks Like High End Storage Systems Are Still Alive

Which Enterprise Hdd Content Application Testing

Which Enterprise Hdd Content Server Test Configuration

Hdd Ssd Flash Storage Iops

Which Enterprise Hdd Use For Database Workloads

Enterprise Hdd For Content Server Different File Size

Which Enterprise Hdd General Io Performance

Enterprise Hdds Evolve For Content Server Applications

Achieve Flexible Data Protection

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

SDDC Data Infrastructure

Check out the above links to data infrastructure resource links.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Getting Caught Up What Happened In September 2017

server storage I/O data infrastructure trends

Getting Caught Up, What Happened In September?

Seems like just yesterday it was the end of August with the start of VMworld in Las Vegas, now its the end of September and Microsoft Ignite in Orlando is wrapping up. Microsoft has made several announcements this week at Ignite including Azure cloud related, AI, IoT, Windows platforms, O365 among others. More about Microsoft Azure, Azure Stack, Windows Server, Hyper-V and related data infrastructure topics in future posts.

Like many of you, September is a busy time of the year, so here is a recap of some of what I have been doing for the past month (among other things).

vmworld 2017

VMworld Las Vegas

During VMworld US VMware announced enhanced workspace, security and endpoint solutions, Pivotal Container Service (PKS) with Google for Kubernetes serverless container management, DXC partnership for hybrid cloud management, security enablement via its AppDefense solutions, data infrastructure platform enhancements including integrated OpenStack, vRealize management tools, vSAN among others. VMware also made announcements including expanded multi-cloud and hybrid cloud support along with VMware on AWS as well as Dell EMC data protection for VMware and AWS environments.

xxxx

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press) at VMworld bookstore

In other VMworld activity, my new book Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press) made its public debut in the VMware book store where I did a book signing event. You can get your copy of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials which includes Software Defined Data Centers (SDDC) along with hybrid, multi-cloud, serverless, converged and related topics at Amazon among other venues. Learn more here.

Software Defined Everything (x)

In early September I was invited to present at the Wipro Software Defined Everything (x) event in New York City. This event follows Wipro invited me to present at in London England this past January at the inaugural SDx Summit event. At the New York City event my presentation was Planning and Enabling Your Journey to SDx which bridged the higher level big picture industry trends to the applied feet on the ground topics. Attendees of the event included customers, prospects, partners, various analyst firms along with Wipro personal.

At the Wipro event during a panel discussion a question was asked about definition of software defined. After the usual vendor and industry responses, mine was a simple, put the emphasis on Define as opposed to software, with a focus on what is the resulting outcome. In other words how and what are you defining (e.g. x) which could be storage, server, data center, data infrastructure, network among others to make a particular result, outcome, service or capability. While the emphasis is around defined, that also can mean curate, compose, craft, program or whatever you prefer to create an outcome.

Image via snia.org

Role of Storage in a Software Defined Data Infrastructure

At the Storage Network Industry Association (SNIA) Storage Developers Conference (SDC) in Santa Clara I did a talk about the role of Storage in Software Defined Data Infrastructures. The theme was that not only is there a role, storage is fundamental and essential for any software defined data infrastructure (as well as legacy) from cloud to container, serverless to virtual servers, converged and hybrid among others. Other themes included the changing role of storage along with how hardware needs software, software needs hardware, and serverless has hardware and software somewhere in the stack. Tradecraft along with other related data infrastructure topics were also discussed.

Data Infrastructures Protect Preserve Secure and Serve Information
Various IT and Cloud Infrastructure Layers including Data Infrastructures

While promoted as an event for storage developers by storage developers, based on a lot of the content presented, SNIA could easily increase attendance to a broader audience with some slight tweaks as well as messaging. If SNIA is looking to focus the event only for vendor storage developers, surprise surprise, there were developers there, however I also talked with IT customers who were there among other non developers. SDC IMHO is not a replacement for SNW, however with some simple adjustments in messaging from who shouldn’t attend to who should or could attend, more attendees and sponsors might just happen appear.

Check out the SNIA SDC presentations here, along with my presentation from the 2017 event here (among others).

tape and cloud storage

Tape in a Software Defined and Hybrid Cloud World

I was invited by Fujifilm to present at their recent 9th annual executive summit in Seattle. The Fujifilm event was attended by various partners, customers and industry folks covering a diverse set of topics. Focus areas spanned from legacy IT to hyper-scale to public cloud and High-Performance Compute (HPC) among others. Magnetic Tape (e.g. tape) may be going away from your data center, however, chances are if you are doing or storing things in the cloud, your data may end up on tape. In other words, not only does tape continue to evolve, its place and how used (as well as accessed) is also changing. Check out the Fujifilm site here where you can scroll down and check out mine and other presentations from the event.

Focus on Data Protection (and recovery)

September also saw hurricanes, tropical storms, flooding, earthquakes, and acts of natural events, to man-made accidental as well as intentional including software-defined threats such as ransomware, malware, virus, Equifax data information breaches, leaks, loss among other security concerns. A reminder that there are the headline-making news events, as well as those that may be more common yet not widely talked about. What this means is that big or small, full or partial damage, destruction, loss or loss of access, data protection should be proactive to enable recovery instead of an afterthought.

Think of data protection as an investment instead of cost overhead, however that also means finding ways to spread costs out while gaining more benefit. Also remember that if something can occur, fail or happen, it probably will. In other words, the question should not be if, rather when, with what impact. This also means evolving from backup/restore, disaster recovery to business resiliency that enables your applications and data to stay available as well as accessible. In other words, how well are you prepared?

Additional data protection related topics and content include:

  • Free Webinar (registration required) with tips for disaster recovery (DR) and business resiliency (BR)
  • Preventing Unexpected Disasters article tip via Iron Mountain
  • Server StorageIO data infrastructure data protection diaries (various tips and content)
  • Free webinar (registration required) planning for GDPR
  • Time to recover, do you know where backup data is (article from Computerweekly)
  • Ensuring your data infrastructure remains available (article from Networkworld)
  • Tips on preparing for Hurricane and storm season (via IronMountain)

Expanding Your Data Infrastructure Tradecraft

At the September Minneapolis St. Paul (MSP) Computer Measurement Group (CMG) event, I gave a presentation discussing industry trends perspectives, buzzword bingo updates including software defined, NVM (the media) vs. NVMe (the interface) benchmarking, tools, cloud, serverless and tradecraft. Tradecraft as a refresher are those skills and fundamental experiences you acquire over time including what tools, techniques to use for different scenarios.

As part of the CMG presentation, the discussion looked at expanding your data infrastructure tradecraft into adjacent areas around your current focus. Also discussed were the importance of context as different words have two or more meanings. For example SAS can mean Scandinavian Air System, Statistics Analysis Software the original unstructured and big data tool, as well as for storage Serial Attached SCSI. However there is another meaning for SAS which spans server, storage, networking, cloud, security and other focus areas which is Shared Access Signature.

Downloads the CMG and other presentations from the Server StorageIO website here.

Where To Learn More

Learn more about related technology, trends, tools, techniques, and tips with the following links.

What This All Means

The above are some of the things I was involved with during September with themes of data infrastructure, data protection, software defined cloud, virtual, serverless containers, servers, storage, I/O networking, SSD including NVMe, performance and capacity planning, metrics that matter, management among other topics. It was great meeting many new people at the various venues this past month, likewise seeing old acquaintances and friends. Also thanks to all who have ordered copies of my new book Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials along with your comments. Check out the Server StorageIO data infrastructure update newsletter for other related activity, industry trends among other topics. Now lets see how fast October and the rest of 2017 goes.

Ok, nuff said, for now.
Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (and vSAN). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio.

Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2023 Server StorageIO(R) and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved.

April 2017 Server StorageIO Data Infrastructures Update Newsletter

Volume 17, Issue IV

Hello and welcome to the April 2017 issue of the Server StorageIO data infrastructures update newsletter.

Spring is here in the northern hemisphere which means that there is a lot of things going on, or about to be occurring soon. April has been a busy month for me including spending time in Europe doing some seminar and workshop presentations, along with other consulting advisory activities involving data infrastructures.

Besides travel, I have been busy working on client projects, attending to various post-production activities for my new book Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (more about this in the May issue). Other things I have been doing include being briefed on upcoming technology announcements along with some hands activities trying out things that will be covered in future updates, as well as working with some interesting NDA items that, well, are NDA.

Be sure to check out the recent blog posts, as well as industry trends perspectives commentary below, along with recent and upcoming webinar among events.

In This Issue

Enjoy this abbreviated edition of the Server StorageIO update newsletter.

Cheers GS

 

Server StorageIOblog Posts

Recent and popular Server StorageIOblog posts include:

View other recent as well as past StorageIOblog posts here

Server StorageIO Commentary in the news

Recent Server StorageIO industry trends perspectives commentary in the news.

Via SearchCloudComputing: Virtual private clouds an alternative to on-premisess computing
Hybrid clouds continue to grow in popularity as well as deployed usage, from storage to compute to networking, said Greg Schulz, the senior advisory analyst at StorageIO in Stillwater, Minn. Most cloud and service providers talk about hybrid along with public clouds, while AWS tends to talk about [VPC aka virtual private clouds].

Via SearchDataCenter: Ask the right questions before committing to a collocation SLA policy
Do you just need a physical space to put things, or do you need high bandwidth and ultra-reliable power? asked Greg Schulz, senior advisory analyst at StorageIO, a consultancy in Stillwater, Minn.

Via EnterpriseStorageForum: Tips for Enterprise SSD Form Factor Selection Deployment
It’s doubtful that there is one form factor to rule them all. Some may be best for X but lousy for Y. But Greg Schulz, an analyst at StorageIO Group notes that many vendors attempt to champion a particular flash SSD form factor and interface, claiming it’s the best and only fit for the enterprise.

Via SearchITOperations: Storage performance analysis reveals IT’s ongoing bottleneck
Sometimes it takes more than an aspirin to cure a headache, said Greg Schulz

Via SearchDNS: Parsing through the software-defined storage hype
Beyond scalability, SDS technology aims for freedom from the limits of proprietary hardware, explained StorageIO analyst Greg Schulz.

Via InfoStor: Data Storage Industry Braces for AI and Machine Learning
AI could also lead to untapped hidden or unknown value in existing data that has no or little perceived value, said Greg Schulz.

View more Server, Storage and I/O trends and perspectives comments here

Events and Activities

Recent and upcoming event activities.

May 11, 2017 – Webinar – Email Archiving, Compliance and Ransomware

May 8-10, 2017 – Dell EMCworld – Las Vegas

April 3-7, 2017 – Seminars – Dutch workshop seminar series – Nijkerk Netherlands

March 15, 2017 – Webinar – SNIA/BrightTalkHyperConverged and Storage – 10AM PT

See more webinars and activities on the Server StorageIO Events page here.

Server StorageIO Industry Resources and Links

Useful links and pages:
Microsoft TechNet – Various Microsoft related from Azure to Docker to Windows
storageio.com/links – Various industry links (over 1,000 with more to be added soon)
objectstoragecenter.com – Cloud and object storage topics, tips and news items
OpenStack.org – Various OpenStack related items
storageio.com/protect – Various data protection items and topics
thenvmeplace.com – Focus on NVMe trends and technologies
thessdplace.com – NVM and Solid State Disk topics, tips and techniques
storageio.com/converge – Various CI, HCI and related SDS topics
storageio.com/performance – Various server, storage and I/O benchmark and tools
VMware Technical Network – Various VMware related items

Cheers
Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert (and vSAN). Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Watch for the spring 2017 release of his new book Software-Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials(CRC Press).

Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2023 Server StorageIO(R) and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved.

March 2017 Server StorageIO Data Infrastructure Update Newsletter

Volume 17, Issue III

Hello and welcome to the March 2017 issue of the Server StorageIO update newsletter.

First a reminder world backup (and recovery) day is on March 31. Following up from the February Server StorageIO update newsletter that had a focus on data protection this edition includes some additional posts, articles, tips and commentary below.

Other data infrastructure (and tradecraft) topics in this edition include cloud, virtual, server, storage and I/O including NVMe as well as networks. Industry trends include new technology and services announcements, cloud services, HPE buying Nimble among other activity. Check out the Converged Infrastructure (CI), Hyper-Converged (HCI) and Cluster in Box (or Cloud in Box) coverage including a recent SNIA webinar I was invited to be the guest presenter for, along with companion post below.

In This Issue

Enjoy this edition of the Server StorageIO update newsletter.

Cheers GS

Data Infrastructure and IT Industry Activity Trends

Some recent Industry Activities, Trends, News and Announcements include:

Dell EMC has discontinued the NVMe direct attached shared DSSD D5 all flash array has been discontinued. At about the same time Dell EMC is shutting down the DSSD D5 product, it has also signaled they will leverage the various technologies including NVMe across their broad server storage portfolio in different ways moving forward. While Dell EMC is shutting down DSSD D5, they are also bringing additional NVMe solutions to the market including those they have been shipping for years (e.g. on the server-side). Learn more about DSSD D5 here and here including perspectives of how it could have been used (plays for playbooks).

Meanwhile NVMe industry activity continues to expand with different solutions from startups such as E8, Excelero, Everspin, Intel, Mellanox, Micron, Samsung and WD SANdisk among others. Also keep in mind, if the answer is NVMe, then what were and are the questions to ask, as well as what are some easy to use benchmark scripts (using fio, diskspd, vdbench, iometer).

Speaking of NVMe, flash and SSDs, Amazon Web Services (AWS) have added new Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) storage and I/O optimized i3 instances. These new instances are available in various configurations with different amounts of vCPU (cores or logical processors), memory and NVMe SSD capacities (and quantity) along with price.

Note that the price per i3 instance varies not only by its configuration, also for image and region deployed in. The flash SSD capacities range from an entry-level (i3.large) with 2 vCPU (logical processors), 15.25GB of RAM and a single 475GB NVMe SSD that for example in the US East Region was recently priced at $0.156 per hour. At the high-end there is the i3.16xlarge with 64 vCPU (logical processors), 488GB RAM and 8 x 1900GB NVMe SSDs with a recent US East Region price of $4.992 per hour. Note that the vCPU refers to the available number of logical processors available and not necessarily cores or sockets.

Also note that your performance will vary, and while NVMe protocol tends to use less CPU per I/O, if generating a large number of I/Os you will need some CPU. What this means is that if you find your performance limited compared to expectations with the lower end i3 instances, move up to a larger instance and see what happens. If you have a Windows-based environment, you can use a tool such as Diskspd to see what happens with I/O performance as you decrease the number of CPUs used.

Chelsio has announced they are now Microsoft Azure Stack Certified with their iWARP RDMA host adapter solutions, as well as for converged infrastructure (CI), hyper-converged (HCI) and legacy server storage deployments. As part of the announcement, Chelsio is also offering a 30 day no cost trial of their adapters for Microsoft Azure Stack, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 client environments. Learn more about the Chelsio trial offer here.

Everspin (the MRAM Spintorque, persistent RAM folks) have announced a new Storage Class Memory (SCM) NVMe accessible family (nvNITRO) of storage accelerator devices (PCIe AiC, U.2). Whats interesting about Everspin is that they are using NVMe for accessing their persistent RAM (e.g. MRAM) making it easily plug compatible with existing operating systems or hypervisors. This means using standard out of the box NVMe drivers where the Everspin SCM appears as a block device (for compatibility) functioning as a low latency, high performance persistent write cache.

Something else interesting besides making the new memory compatible with existing servers CPU complex via PCIe, is how Everspin is demonstrating that NVMe as a general access protocol is not just exclusive to nand flash-based SSDs. What this means is that instead of using non-persistent DRAM, or slower NAND flash (or 3D XPoint SCM), Everspin nvNITRO enables high endurance write cache with persistent to compliment existing NAND flash as well as emerging 3D XPoint based storage. Keep an eye on Everspin as they are doing some interesting things for future discussions.

Google Cloud Services has added additional regions (cloud locations) and other enhancements.

HPE continued buying into server storage I/O data infrastructure technologies announcing an all cash (e.g. no stock) acquisition of Nimble Storage (NMBL). The cash acquisition for a little over $1B USD amounts to $12.50 USD per Nimble share, double what it had traded at. As a refresh, or overview, Nimble is an all flash shared storage system leverage NAND flash solid storage device (SSD) performance. Note that Nimble also partners with Cisco and Lenovo platforms that compete with HPE servers for converged systems.View additional perspectives here.

Riverbed has announced the release of Steelfusion 5 which while its name implies physical hardware metal, the solution is available as tin wrapped (e.g. hardware appliance) software. However the solution is also available for deployment as a VMware virtual appliance for remote office branch office (ROBO) among others. Enhancements include converged functionality such as NAS support along with network latency as well as bandwidth among other features.

Check out other industry news, comments, trends perspectives here.

Server StorageIOblog Posts

Recent and popular Server StorageIOblog posts include:

View other recent as well as past StorageIOblog posts here

Server StorageIO Commentary in the news

Recent Server StorageIO industry trends perspectives commentary in the news.

Via InfoStor: 8 Big Enterprise SSD Trends to Expect in 2017
Watch for increased capacities at lower cost, differentiation awareness of high-capacity, low-cost and lower performing SSDs versus improved durability and performance along with cost capacity enhancements for active SSD (read and write optimized). You can also expect increased support for NVMe both as a back-end storage device with different form factors (e.g., M.2 gum sticks, U.2 8639 drives, PCIe cards) as well as front-end (e.g., storage systems that are NVMe-attached) including local direct-attached and fiber-attached. This means more awareness around NVMe both as front-end and back-end deployment options.

Via SearchITOperations: Storage performance bottlenecks
Sometimes it takes more than an aspirin to cure a headache. There may be a bottleneck somewhere else, in hardware, software, storage system architecture or something else.

Via SearchDNS: Parsing through the software-defined storage hype
Beyond scalability, SDS technology aims for freedom from the limits of proprietary hardware.

Via InfoStor: Data Storage Industry Braces for AI and Machine Learning
AI could also lead to untapped hidden or unknown value in existing data that has no or little perceived value

Via SearchDataCenter: New options to evolve data backup recovery

View more Server, Storage and I/O trends and perspectives comments here

Various Tips, Tools, Technology and Tradecraft Topics

Recent Data Infrastructure Tradecraft Articles, Tips, Tools, Tricks and related topics.

Via ComputerWeekly: Time to restore from backup: Do you know where your data is?
Via IDG/NetworkWorld: Ensure your data infrastructure remains available and resilient
Via IDG/NetworkWorld: Whats a data infrastructure?

Check out Scott Lowe @Scott_Lowe of VMware fame who while having a virtual networking focus has a nice roundup of related data infrastructure topics cloud, open source among others.

Want to take a break from reading or listening to tech talk, check out some of the fun videos including aerial drone (and some technology topics) at www.storageio.tv.

View more tips and articles here

Events and Activities

Recent and upcoming event activities.

May 8-10, 2017 – Dell EMCworld – Las Vegas

April 3-7, 2017 – Seminars – Dutch workshop seminar series – Nijkerk Netherlands

March 15, 2017 – Webinar – SNIA/BrightTalkHyperConverged and Storage – 10AM PT

January 26 2017 – Seminar – Presenting at Wipro SDx Summit London UK

See more webinars and activities on the Server StorageIO Events page here.


Cheers
Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert (and vSAN). Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Watch for the spring 2017 release of his new book Software-Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials(CRC Press).

Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2023 Server StorageIO(R) and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved.

Some popular 2016 storageioblog posts

Some popular 2016 storageioblog posts

server storage I/O trends

Big Files and Lots of Little File Processing and Benchmarking with Vdbench – Need to test, validate, compare, contrast or simply apply workload to file systems, NAS or other file-based access? Want the flexibility and simplicity to software define your benchmark workload to meet various needs? For example, millions of small files or thousands of large 5GB, 10GB, 15GB (or larger) files with various read, write size and access patterns spanning a single directory, or many with various depths? Do you want the flexibility for different platforms including Windows, *NIX, bare metal, container, virtual or cloud without a bulk tool using simple scripts that produce lots of insightful results? Then you will want to check this post out.

Breaking the VMware ESXi 5.5 ACPI boot loop on Lenovo TD350 – Ever have a VMware host server go into a boot loop and purple screen of death (PSD) then displaying a message about ACPI or similar? After spending time searching and applying many filters to sift through the noise of false positive matches, finally found the simple fix (e.g. a BIOS setting) to break the VMware ESXi vSphere boot loop, or at least on a Lenovo server.

Cloud and Object Storage

Cloud conversations: AWS EBS, Glacier and S3 overview (Part I) – This is one of the perennial favorites that while new features have been added with others extended, the post series still provides a good overview, primer or refresher of various Amazon Web Services (AWS) services including how they work. Interesting in learning more about Microsoft and Azure, then check out this, this, this and this.

Cloud Conversations: AWS EFS Elastic File System (Cloud NAS) – This is a companion to the above AWS as well as other cloud post series that looks at AWS Elastic File System. Note that other cloud service providers have also added NAS file access support, some are intra (e.g. inside AWS cloud), others are inter-cloud (e.g. inside and outside cloud) such as Azure (can work with external Windows Servers using SMB3). Even OpenStack has added NAS file with Manila folders and Ceph with CephFS among others. So when some people tell you that NAS and file access are dead particular for cloud, remind them of the increasing number of services and software stacks that are adding new services to allow their solution to be compatible with existing environments or applications.

Server Storage I/O performance

Collecting Transaction Per Minute from SQL Server and HammerDB – If you have used the free tool HammerDB (e.g. Hammora) for driving database workloads, simulations or benchmarks you should recall that the resulting statistics are rather lacking. Sure there is a nice GUI chart that shows current executing transactions per second (TPS) along with some very simple counters in the log. However compared to some other tools such as sysbench, Quest Benchmark Factory and YCSB among others, the Hammer metrics are rather lacking. In this post I show how you can collect some more metrics from SQL Server if you have to use HammerDB. View more server storage I/O performance benchmark and monitoring tools resources here.

Windows Server 2016

Gaining Server Storage I/O Insight into Microsoft Windows Server 2016 – Microsoft released into general availability Windows Server 2016 and this post looks at some of the new features along with functionality including Storage Spaces Direct (S2D), Storage Replica (SR) as well as other enhancements. With these new and enhanced features Windows Servers increase their interoperability with Azure, as well as supporting aggregated hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI), disaggregated converged (CI) as well as traditional workloads along with Hyper-V (and containers). One of the other new enhancements in Windows Server 2016 which now uses ReFS (Reliable File System) as its default file system that you can read more about here. RIP Windows SIS (Single Instance Storage), or at least in Server 2016 With Windows Server 2016 Microsoft removed single instance storage replacing with new capabilities that you can read more about in the this post.

Garbage data in garbage data out

Garbage data in, garbage information out, big data or big garbage? There is a classic IT expression of garbage data in results in garbage data (or information out) in that your algorithms and data structures (which equals programs e.g. Niklaus Wirth) are only as good as the data they work on. What this means then is that if there is a large amount of big data then there can also be a big garbage in and garbage out problem unless addressed.

Hard product vs. soft product – Hard product refers to something such as hardware, software or a service resource that is obtained and then joined with other resources in a particular way to create a soft product. Not to be confused with software, the soft product is the result or how resources get defined that give some ability or benefit. Think of a soft product as for how airlines can use the same airplane, serve the same coca cola, have same seats, yet their soft product is the service experience of how those are delivered, as well as how you find and buy or use them. Another way of thinking about it is hard products are the ingredients for a recipe, the recipe defines how those ingredients result in some food dish.

how many IOPs can an HDD or SSD do

Part II: How many IOPS can a HDD, HHDD or SSD do with VMware? – This is part of a multi-post series looking at how many IOPs (or bandwidth) various HDD and SSDs can do handling different workloads. Of course, your results will vary with configuration settings, tools among other considerations. However, some of the older rules of thumb (RUT) about RPM and other considerations for HDDs have changed and continue to do so. As an example of how HDDs continue to evolve check out this popular post from the 2016 list Which Enterprise HDDs to use for a Content Server Platform.

Part II: What I did with Lenovo TS140 in my Server and Storage I/O Review – This is a popular post series of some things I have done with a Lenovo TS140 including defining with various software as well as hardware. This is a great price performer value system that several years ago after testing one Lenovo sent me, I returned that to Lenovo and bought several of them to join my other systems.

Server and Storage I/O Benchmarking and Performance Resources – This is a collection of various server, storage I/O and networking hardware, software as well as services tools, techniques as well as tips for benchmarking, comparing, simulation, testing, gaining insight across cloud, virtual, container and legacy resources. Server and Storage I/O Benchmark Tools: Microsoft Diskspd (Part I) – This is one of the tools found on the server, storage I/O benchmarking and performance resources page. Diskspd is a tool developed by Microsoft as an alternative to using Iometer, vdbench, fio.exe, SQLIO among many others, plus, it is on github.

server storage I/O nvme and ssd

The NVM (Non Volatile Memory) and NVMe Place – Interesting and adoption in nand flash, nvram, 3D XPoint among other SSD and Non-volatile Memory (NVM) continues. Another popular post that you can find at thenvmeplace.com is this NVMe overview and primer – Part I. There is a growing interest, awareness and deployment adoption around NVM Express (NVMe) the new protocol for accessing NVMs and SSDs. Some of the common conversations and questions I encounter is confusion between NVM and NVMe, too which the answer is one (the former) are the media or devices, the other is the access method alternative to using AHCI/SATA or SCSI (e.g. SAS, iSCSI, FCP, SRP) among others.

VMware VVOLs and storage I/O fundamentals (Part 1) – VMware Virtual Volumes (VVOL) continue to gain adoption and this post is part of an overview and primer. If you want to go deeper into VVOL as well as see some adoption insights check out Eric Sieberts post here over at vsphere-land.com

Welcome to the Object Storage Center page – This is a micro site that has a primer and overview of cloud as well as object storage along with an expanding list of links to various resources, tips, technologies, tools, trends and industry activity.

Where To Learn More

www.storageio.com particular if you have not been there for awhile to check out the new streamlined look and navigation to various content including Server StorageIO update newsletters (free subscription) among other resources.

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What this all means and wrapping up

Some of the popular posts for 2016 are perennial favorites and based on experience will probably appear on the 2017 list. However there are also several new posts that appeared in 2016 that I suspect will also appear on the 2017 version of the above list, along with new content from 2017.

Thank you to all of you who frequent StorageIOblog.com as well as StorageIO.com along with our various micro sites including server storage I/O performance and benchmarking resources, thenvmeplace.com, thessdplace.com, cloud and objectstoragecenter.com, data protection diaries among others.

Also thank you for viewing various partner venues and syndicates with extra ones appearing throughout 2017. Watch for more content in the coming weeks, months and throughout 2017 on software defined data infrastructures (SDDI) along with server, storage I/O, networking, hardware, software, cloud, container, data protection and related topics, trends, technologies, tools and tips.

Again, thank you

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Server storage I/O performance benchmark workload scripts Part I

Server storage I/O performance benchmark workload scripts Part I

Server storage I/O performance benchmark workload scripts

Update 1/28/2018

This is part one of a two-part series of posts about Server storage I/O performance benchmark workload tools and scripts. View part II here which includes the workload scripts and where to view sample results.

There are various tools and workloads for server I/O benchmark testing, validation and exercising different storage devices (or systems and appliances) such as Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) flash Solid State Devices (SSDs) or Hard Disk Drives (HDD) among others.

NVMe ssd storage
Various NVM flash SSD including NVMe devices

For example, lets say you have an SSD such as an Intel 750 (here, here, and here) or some other vendors NVMe PCIe Add in Card (AiC) installed into a Microsoft Windows server and would like to see how it compares with expected results. The following scripts allow you to validate your system with those of others running the same workload, granted of course your mileage (performance) may vary.

server storage I/O SCM NVM SSD performance

Why Your Performance May Vary

Reasons you performance may vary include among others:

  • GHz Speed of your server, number of sockets, cores
  • Amount of main DRAM memory
  • Number, type and speed of PCIe slots
  • Speed of storage device and any adapters
  • Device drivers and firmware of storage devices and adapters
  • Server power mode setting (e.g. low or balanced power vs. high-performance)
  • Other workload running on system and device under test
  • Solar flares (kp-index) among other urban (or real) myths and issues
  • Typos or misconfiguration of workload test scripts
  • Test server, storage, I/O device, software and workload configuration
  • Versions of test software tools among others

Windows Power (and performance) Settings

Some things are assumed or taken for granted that everybody knows and does, however sometimes the obvious needs to be stated or re-stated. An example is remembering to check your server power management settings to see if they are in energy efficiency power savings mode, or, in high-performance mode. Note that if your focus is on getting the best possible performance for effective productivity, then you want to be in high performance mode. On the other hand if performance is not your main concern, instead a focus on energy avoidance, then low power mode, or perhaps balanced.

For Microsoft Windows Servers, Desktop Workstations, Laptops and Tablets you can adjust power settings via control panel and GUI as well as command line or Powershell. From command line (privileged or administrator) the following are used for setting balanced or high-performance power settings.

Balanced

powercfg.exe /setactive 381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e

High Performance

powercfg.exe /setactive 8c5e7fda-e8bf-4a96-9a85-a6e23a8c635c

From Powershell the following set balanced or high-performance.

Balanced
PowerCfg -SetActive "381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e"

High Performance
PowerCfg -SetActive "8c5e7fda-e8bf-4a96-9a85-a6e23a8c635c"

Note that you can list Windows power management settings using powercfg -LIST and powercfg -QUERY

server storage I/O power management

Btw, if you have not already done so, enable Windows disk (HDD and SSD) performance counters so that they appear via Task Manager by entering from a command prompt:

diskperf -y

Workload (Benchmark) Simulation Test Tools Used

There are many tools (see storageio.com/performance) that can be used for creating and running workloads just as there are various application server I/O characteristics. Different server I/O and application performance attributes include among others read vs. write, random vs. sequential, large vs. small, long vs. short stride, burst vs. sustain, cache and non-cache friendly, activity vs. data movement vs. latency vs. CPU usage among others. Likewise the number of workers, jobs, threads, outstanding and overlapped I/O among other configuration settings can have an impact on workload and results.

The four free tools that I’m using with this set of scripts are:

  • Microsoft Diskspd (free), get the tool and bits here or here (open source), learn more about Diskspd here.
  • FIO.exe (free), get the tool and bits here or here among other venues.
  • Vdbench (free with registration), get the tool and bits here or here among other venues.
  • Iometer (free), get the tool and bits here among other venues.

Notice: While best effort has been made to verify the above links, they may change over time and you are responsible for verifying the safety of links and your downloads.

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

Remember, everything is not the same in the data center or with data infrastructures that support different applications.

While some tools are more robust or better than others for different things, ultimately it’s usually not the tool that results in a bad benchmark or comparison, it’s the configuration or lack of including workload settings that are not relevant or applicable. The best benchmark, workload or simulation is your own application. Second best is one that closely resembles your application workload characteristics. A bad benchmark is one that has no relevance to your environment, application use scenario. Take and treat all benchmark or workload simulation results with a grain of salt as something to compare, contrast or make reference to in the proper context. Read part two of this post series to view test tool workload scripts along with sample results.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Part II – Some server storage I/O workload scripts and results

Part II – Some server storage I/O workload scripts and results

server storage I/O trends

Updated 1/28/2018

This is the second in a two part series of posts pertaining to using some common server storage I/O workload benchmark tools and scripts. View part I here which includes overview, background and information about the tools used and related topics.

NVMe ssd storage
Various NVM flash SSD including NVMe devices

Following are some server I/O benchmark workload scripts to exercise various storage devices such as Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) flash Solid State Devices (SSDs) or Hard Disk Drives (HDD) among others.

The Workloads

Some ways that can impact the workload performance results besides changing the I/O size, read write, random sequential mix is the number of threads, workers and jobs. Note that in the workload steps, the larger 1MB and sequential scenarios have fewer threads, workers vs. the smaller IOP or activity focused workloads. Too many threads or workers can cause overhead and you will reach a point of diminishing return at some point. Likewise too few and you will not drive the system under test (SUT) or device under test (DUT) to its full potential. If you are not sure how many threads or workers to use, run some short calibration tests to see the results before doing a large, longer test.

Keep in mind that the best benchmark or workload is your own application running with similar load to what you would see in real world, along with applicable features, configuration and functionality enabled. The second best would be those that closely resemble your workload characteristics and that are relevant.

The following workloads involved a system test initiator (STI) server driving workload using the different tools as well as scripts shown. The STI sends the workload to a SUT or DUT that can be a single drive, card or multiple devices, storage system or appliance. Warning: The following workload tests does both reads and writes which can be destructive to your device under test. Exercise caution on the device and file name specified to avoid causing a problem that might result in you testing your backup / recovery process. Likewise no warranty is given, implied or made for these scripts or their use or results, they are simply supplied as is for your reference.

The four free tools that I’m using with this set of scripts are:

  • Microsoft Diskspd (free), get the tool and bits here or here (open source), learn more about Diskspd here.
  • FIO.exe (free), get the tool and bits here or here among other venues.
  • Vdbench (free with registration), get the tool and bits here or here among other venues.
  • Iometer (free), get the tool and bits here among other venues.

Notice: While best effort has been made to verify the above links, they may change over time and you are responsible for verifying the safety of links and your downloads

Microsoft Diskspd workloads

Note that a 300GB size file named iobw.tst on device N: is being used for performing read and write I/Os to. There are 160 threads, I/O size of 4KB and 8KB varying from 100% Read (0% write), 70% Read (30% write) and 0% Read (100% write) with random (seek) and no hardware or software cache. Also specified are to collect latency statistics, a 30 second warm up ramp up time, and a quick 5 minute duration (test time). 5 minutes is a quick test for calibration, verify your environment however relatively short for a real test which should be in the hours or more depending on your needs.

Note that the output results are put into a file with a name describing the test tool, workload and other useful information such as date and time. You may also want to specify a different directory where output files are placed.

diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b4K -w0 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_4KRan100Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b4K -w30 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_4KRan70Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b4K -w100 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_4KRan0Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b8K -w0 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_8KRan100Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b8K -w30 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_8KRan70Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b8K -w100 -W30 -d300 -h -fr  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_8KRan0Read_160x160_072416_8AM.txt

The following Diskspd tests use similar settings as above, however instead of random, sequential is specified, threads and outstanding I/Os are reduced while I/O size is set to 1MB, then 8KB, with 100% read and 100% write scenarios. The -t specifies the number of threads and -o number of outstanding I/Os per thread.

diskspd.exe -c300G -o32 -t132 -b1M -w0 -W30 -d300 -h -si  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_1MSeq100Read_32x32_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o32 -t132 -b1M -w100 -W30 -d300 -h -si  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_1MSeq0Read_32x32_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b8K -w0 -W30 -d300 -h -si  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_8KSeq100Read_32x32_072416_8AM.txt
diskspd.exe -c300G -o160 -t160 -b8K -w100 -W30 -d300 -h -si  N:iobw.tst -L  > DiskSPD_300G_8KSeq0Read_32x32_072416_8AM.txt

Fio.exe workloads

Next are the fio workloads similar to those run using Diskspd except the sequential scenarios are skipped.

fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=4k --bs=4k --rwmixread=100 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_4KRan100Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt
fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=4k --bs=4k --rwmixread=70 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_4KRan70Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt
fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=4k --bs=4k --rwmixread=0 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_4KRan0Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt
fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=8k --bs=8k --rwmixread=100 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_8KRan100Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt
fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=8k --bs=8k --rwmixread=70 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_8KRan70Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt
fio --filename=N\:\iobw.tst --filesize=300000M --direct=1  --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=windowsaio  --ba=8k --bs=8k --rwmixread=0 --iodepth=32 --numjobs=5 --exitall --time_based  --ramp_time=30 --runtime=300 --group_reporting --name=xxx  --output=FIO_300000M_8KRan0Read_5x32_072416_8AM.txt

Vdbench workloads

Next are the Vdbench workloads similar to those used with the Microsoft Diskspd scenarios. In addition to making sure Vdbench is installed and working, you will need to create a text file called seqrxx.txt containing the following:

hd=localhost,jvms=!jvmn
sd=sd1,lun=!drivename,openflags=directio,size=!dsize
wd=mix,sd=sd1
rd=!jobname,wd=mix,elapsed=!etime,interval=!itime,iorate=max,forthreads=(!tthreads),forxfersize=(!worktbd),forseekpct=(!workseek),forrdpct=(!workread),openflags=directio

The following are the commands that call the Vdbench script file. Note Vdbench puts output files (yes, plural there are many results) in a output folder.

vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=4k workseek=100 workread=100 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o  vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_4K100Ran100Read_0726166AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=4k workseek=100 workread=70 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_4K100Ran70Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=4k workseek=100 workread=0 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_4K100Ran0Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=100 workread=100 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Ran100Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=100 workread=70 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Ran70Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=100 workread=0 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Seq0Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=0 workread=100 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Seq100Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=0 workread=70 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Seq70Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=160 jvmn=64 worktbd=8k workseek=0 workread=0 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_160TH_8K100Seq0Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=32 jvmn=64 worktbd=1M workseek=0 workread=100 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_32TH_1M100Seq100Read_072416_8AM
vdbench -f seqrxx.txt dsize=300G  tthreads=32 jvmn=64 worktbd=1M workseek=0 workread=0 jobname=NVME etime=300 itime=30 drivename="\\.\N:\iobw.tst" -o vdbench_NNVMe_300GB_64JVM_32TH_1M100Seq0Read_072416_8AM

Iometer workloads

Last however not least, lets do an Iometer run. The following command calls an Iometer input file (icf) that you can find here. In that file you will need to make a few changes including the name of the server where Iometer is running, description and device under test address. For example in the icf file change SIOSERVER to the name of the server where you will be running Iometer from. Also change the address for the DUT, for example N: to what ever address, drive, mount point you are using. Also update the description accordingly (e.g. "NVME" to "Your test example".

Here is the command line to run Iometer specifying an icf and where to put the results in a CSV file that can be imported into Excel or other tools.

iometer /c  iometer_5work32q_intel_Profile.icf /r iometer_nvmetest_5work32q_072416_8AM.csv

server storage I/O SCM NVM SSD performance

What About The Results?

For context, the following results were run on a Lenovo TS140 (32GB RAM), single socket quad core (3.2GHz) Intel E3-1225 v3 with an Intel NVMe 750 PCIe AiC (Intel SSDPEDMW40). Out of the box Microsoft Windows NVMe drive and controller drivers were used (e.g. 6.3.9600.18203 and 6.3.9600.16421). Operating system is Windows 2012 R2 (bare metal) with NVMe PCIe card formatted with ReFS file system. Workload generator and benchmark driver tools included Microsoft Diskspd version 2.012, Fio.exe version 2.2.3, Vdbench 50403 and Iometer 1.1.0. Note that there are newer versions of the various workload generation tools.

Example results are located here.

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

Remember, everything is not the same in the data center or with data infrastructures that support different applications.

While some tools are more robust or better than others for different things, ultimately its usually not the tool that results in a bad benchmark or comparison, its the configuration or lack of including workload settings that are not relevant or applicable. The best benchmark, workload or simulation is your own application. Second best is one that closely resembles your application workload characteristics. A bad benchmark is one that has no relevance to your environment, application use scenario. Take and treat all benchmark or workload simulation results with a grain of salt as something to compare, contrast or make reference to in the proper context.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Which Enterprise HDD for Content Server Platform

Which Enterprise HDD to use for a Content Server Platform

data infrastructure HDD server storage I/O trends

Updated 1/23/2018

Which enterprise HDD to use with a content server platform?

Insight for effective server storage I/O decision making
Server StorageIO Lab Review

Which enterprise HDD to use for content servers

This post is the first in a multi-part series based on a white paper hands-on lab report I did compliments of Equus Computer Systems and Seagate that you can read in PDF form here. The focus is looking at the Equus Computer Systems (www.equuscs.com) converged Content Solution platforms with Seagate Enterprise Hard Disk Drive (HDD’s). I was given the opportunity to do some hands-on testing running different application workloads with a 2U content solution platform along with various Seagate Enterprise 2.5” HDD’s handle different application workloads. This includes Seagate’s Enterprise Performance HDD’s with the enhanced caching feature.

Issues And Challenges

Even though Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) including NAND flash solid state devices (SSDs) have become popular storage for use internal as well as external to servers, there remains the need for HDD’s Like many of you who need to make informed server, storage, I/O hardware, software and configuration selection decisions, time is often in short supply.

A common industry trend is to use SSD and HDD based storage mediums together in hybrid configurations. Another industry trend is that HDD’s continue to be enhanced with larger space capacity in the same or smaller footprint, as well as with performance improvements. Thus, a common challenge is what type of HDD to use for various content and application workloads balancing performance, availability, capacity and economics.

Content Applications and Servers

Fast Content Needs Fast Solutions

An industry and customer trend are that information and data are getting larger, living longer, as well as there is more of it. This ties to the fundamental theme that applications and their underlying hardware platforms exist to process, move, protect, preserve and serve information.

Content solutions span from video (4K, HD, SD and legacy streaming video, pre-/post-production, and editing), audio, imaging (photo, seismic, energy, healthcare, etc.) to security surveillance (including Intelligent Video Surveillance [ISV] as well as Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance [ISR]). In addition to big fast data, other content solution applications include content distribution network (CDN) and caching, network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined network (SDN), to cloud and other rich unstructured big fast media data, analytics along with little data (e.g. SQL and NoSQL database, key-value stores, repositories and meta-data) among others.

Content Solutions And HDD Opportunities

A common theme with content solutions is that they get defined with some amount of hardware (compute, memory and storage, I/O networking connectivity) as well as some type of content software. Fast content applications need fast software, multi-core processors (compute), large memory (DRAM, NAND flash, SSD and HDD’s) along with fast server storage I/O network connectivity. Content-based applications benefit from having frequently accessed data as close as possible to the application (e.g. locality of reference).

Content solution and application servers need flexibility regarding compute options (number of sockets, cores, threads), main memory (DRAM DIMMs), PCIe expansion slots, storage slots and other connectivity. An industry trend is leveraging platforms with multi-socket processors, dozens of cores and threads (e.g. logical processors) to support parallel or high-concurrent content applications. These servers have large amounts of local storage space capacity (NAND flash SSD and HDD) and associated I/O performance (PCIe, NVMe, 40 GbE, 10 GbE, 12 Gbps SAS etc.) in addition to using external shared storage (local and cloud).

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

Fast content applications need fast content and flexible content solution platforms such as those from Equus Computer Systems and HDD’s from Seagate. Key to a successful content application deployment is having the flexibility to hardware define and software defined the platform to meet your needs. Just as there are many different types of content applications along with diverse environments, content solution platforms need to be flexible, scalable and robust, not to mention cost effective.

Continue reading part two of this multi-part series here where we look at how and what to test as well as project planning.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Which Enterprise HDD for Content Applications Different File Size Impact

Which HDD for Content Applications Different File Size Impact

Different File Size Impact server storage I/O trends

Updated 1/23/2018

Which enterprise HDD to use with a content server platform different file size impact.

Insight for effective server storage I/O decision making
Server StorageIO Lab Review

Which enterprise HDD to use for content servers

This is the fifth in a multi-part series (read part four here) based on a white paper hands-on lab report I did compliments of Servers Direct and Seagate that you can read in PDF form here. The focus is looking at the Servers Direct (www.serversdirect.com) converged Content Solution platforms with Seagate Enterprise Hard Disk Drive (HDD’s). In this post the focus looks at large and small file I/O processing.

File Performance Activity

Tip, Content solutions use files in various ways. Use the following to gain perspective how various HDD’s handle workloads similar to your specific needs.

Two separate file processing workloads were run (12), one with a relative small number of large files, and another with a large number of small files. For the large file processing (table-3), 5 GByte sized files were created and then accessed via 128 Kbyte (128KB) sized I/O over a 10 hour period with 90% read using 64 threads (workers). Large file workload simulates what might be seen with higher definition video, image or other content streaming.

(Note 12) File processing workloads were run using Vdbench 5.04 and file anchors with sample script configuration below. Instead of vdbench you could also use other tools such as sysbench or fio among others.

VdbenchFSBigTest.txt
# Sample script for big files testing
fsd=fsd1,anchor=H:,depth=1,width=5,files=20,size=5G
fwd=fwd1,fsd=fsd1,rdpct=90,xfersize=128k,fileselect=random,fileio=random,threads=64
rd=rd1,fwd=fwd1,fwdrate=max,format=yes,elapsed=10h,interval=30

vdbench -f VdbenchFSBigTest.txt -m 16 -o Results_FSbig_H_060615

VdbenchFSSmallTest.txt
# Sample script for big files testing
fsd=fsd1,anchor=H:,depth=1,width=64,files=25600,size=16k
fwd=fwd1,fsd=fsd1,rdpct=90,xfersize=1k,fileselect=random,fileio=random,threads=64
rd=rd1,fwd=fwd1,fwdrate=max,format=yes,elapsed=10h,interval=30

vdbench -f VdbenchFSSmallTest.txt -m 16 -o Results_FSsmall_H_060615

The 10% writes are intended to reflect some update activity for new content or other changes to content. Note that 128KB per second translates to roughly 1 Gbps streaming content such as higher definition video. However 4K video (not optimized) would require a higher speed as well as resulting in larger file sizes. Table-3 shows the performance during the large file access period showing average read /write rates and response time, bandwidth (MBps), average open and close rates with response time.

Avg. File Read Rate

Avg. Read Resp. Time
Sec.

Avg. File Write Rate

Avg. Write Resp. Time
Sec.

Avg.
CPU %
Total

Avg. CPU % System

Avg. MBps
Read

Avg. MBps
Write

ENT 15K R1

580.7

107.9

64.5

19.7

52.2

35.5

72.6

8.1

ENT 10K R1

455.4

135.5

50.6

44.6

34.0

22.7

56.9

6.3

ENT CAP R1

285.5

221.9

31.8

19.0

43.9

28.3

37.7

4.0

ENT 10K R10

690.9

87.21

76.8

48.6

35.0

21.8

86.4

9.6

Table-3 Performance summary for large file access operations (90% read)

Table-3 shows that for two-drive RAID 1, the Enterprise 15K are the fastest performance, however using a RAID 10 with four 10K HDD’s with enhanced cache features provide a good price, performance and space capacity option. Software RAID was used in this workload test.

Figure-4 shows the relative performance of various HDD options handling large files, keep in mind that for the response line lower is better, while for the activity rate higher is better.

large file processing
Figure-4 Large file processing 90% read, 10% write rate and response time

In figure-4 you can see the performance in terms of response time (reads larger dashed line, writes smaller dotted line) along with number of file read operations per second (reads solid blue column bar, writes green column bar). Reminder that lower response time, and higher activity rates are better. Performance declines moving from left to right, from 15K to 10K Enterprise Performance with enhanced cache feature to Enterprise Capacity (7.2K), all of which were hardware RAID 1. Also shown is a hardware RAID 10 (four x 10K HDD’s).

Results in figure-4 above and table-4 below show how various drives can be configured to balance their performance, capacity and costs to meet different needs. Table-4 below shows an analysis looking at average file reads per second (RPS) performance vs. HDD costs, usable capacity and protection level.

Table-4 is an example of looking at multiple metrics to make informed decisions as to which HDD would be best suited to your specific needs. For example RAID 10 using four 10K drives provides good performance and protection along with large usable space, however that also comes at a budget cost (e.g. price).

Avg.
File Reads Per Sec. (RPS)

Single Drive Cost per RPS

Multi-Drive Cost per RPS

Single Drive Cost / Per GB Capacity

Cost / Per GB Usable (Protected) Cap.

Drive Cost (Multiple Drives)

Protection Overhead (Space Capacity for RAID)

Cost per usable GB per RPS

Avg. File Read Resp. (Sec.)

ENT 15K R1

580.7

$1.02

$2.05

$ 0.99

$0.99

$1,190

100%

$2.1

107.9

ENT 10K R1

455.5

1.92

3.84

0.49

0.49

1,750

100%

3.8

135.5

ENT CAP R1

285.5

1.40

2.80

0.20

0.20

798

100%

2.8

271.9

ENT 10K R10

690.9

1.27

5.07

0.49

0.97

3,500

100%

5.1

87.2

Table-4 Performance, capacity and cost analysis for big file processing

Small File Size Processing

To simulate a general file sharing environment, or content streaming with many smaller objects, 1,638,464 16KB sized files were created on each device being tested (table-5). These files were spread across 64 directories (25,600 files each) and accessed via 64 threads (workers) doing 90% reads with a 1KB I/O size over a ten hour time frame. Like the large file test, and database activity, all workloads were run at the same time (e.g. test devices were concurrently busy).

Avg. File Read Rate

Avg. Read Resp. Time
Sec.

Avg. File Write Rate

Avg. Write Resp. Time
Sec.

Avg.
CPU %
Total

Avg. CPU % System

Avg. MBps
Read

Avg. MBps
Write

ENT 15K R1

3,415.7

1.5

379.4

132.2

24.9

19.5

3.3

0.4

ENT 10K R1

2,203.4

2.9

244.7

172.8

24.7

19.3

2.2

0.2

ENT CAP R1

1,063.1

12.7

118.1

303.3

24.6

19.2

1.1

0.1

ENT 10K R10

4,590.5

0.7

509.9

101.7

27.7

22.1

4.5

0.5

Table-5 Performance summary for small sized (16KB) file access operations (90% read)

Figure-5 shows the relative performance of various HDD options handling large files, keep in mind that for the response line lower is better, while for the activity rate higher is better.

small file processing
Figure-5 Small file processing 90% read, 10% write rate and response time

In figure-5 you can see the performance in terms of response time (reads larger dashed line, writes smaller dotted line) along with number of file read operations per second (reads solid blue column bar, writes green column bar). Reminder that lower response time, and higher activity rates are better. Performance declines moving from left to right, from 15K to 10K Enterprise Performance with enhanced cache feature to Enterprise Capacity (7.2K RPM), all of which were hardware RAID 1. Also shown is a hardware RAID 10 (four x 10K RPM HDD’s) that has higher performance and capacity along with costs (table-5).

Results in figure-5 above and table-5 below show how various drives can be configured to balance their performance, capacity and costs to meet different needs. Table-6 below shows an analysis looking at average file reads per second (RPS) performance vs. HDD costs, usable capacity and protection level.

Table-6 is an example of looking at multiple metrics to make informed decisions as to which HDD would be best suited to your specific needs. For example RAID 10 using four 10K drives provides good performance and protection along with large usable space, however that also comes at a budget cost (e.g. price).

Avg.
File Reads Per Sec. (RPS)

Single Drive Cost per RPS

Multi-Drive Cost per RPS

Single Drive Cost / Per GB Capacity

Cost / Per GB Usable (Protected) Cap.

Drive Cost (Multiple Drives)

Protection Overhead (Space Capacity for RAID)

Cost per usable GB per RPS

Avg. File Read Resp. (Sec.)

ENT 15K R1

3,415.7

$0.17

$0.35

$0.99

$0.99

$1,190

100%

$0.35

1.51

ENT 10K R1

2,203.4

0.40

0.79

0.49

0.49

1,750

100%

0.79

2.90

ENT CAP R1

1,063.1

0.38

0.75

0.20

0.20

798

100%

0.75

12.70

ENT 10K R10

4,590.5

0.19

0.76

0.49

0.97

3,500

100%

0.76

0.70

Table-6 Performance, capacity and cost analysis for small file processing

Looking at the small file processing analysis in table-5 shows that the 15K HDD’s on an apples to apples basis (e.g. same RAID level and number of drives) provide the best performance. However when also factoring in space capacity, performance, different RAID level or other protection schemes along with cost, there are other considerations. On the other hand the Enterprise Capacity 2TB HDD’s have a low cost per capacity, however do not have the performance of other options, assuming your applications need more performance.

Thus the right HDD for one application may not be the best one for a different scenario as well as multiple metrics as shown in table-5 need to be included in an informed storage decision making process.

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

File processing are common content applications tasks, some being small, others large or mixed as well as reads and writes. Even if your content environment is using object storage, chances are unless it is a new applications or a gateway exists, you may be using NAS or file based access. Thus the importance of if your applications are doing file based processing, either run your own applications or use tools that can simulate as close as possible to what your environment is doing.

Continue reading part six in this multi-part series here where the focus is around general I/O including 8KB and 128KB sized IOPs along with associated metrics.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Which Enterprise HDD for Content Applications General I/O Performance

Which HDD for Content Applications general I/O Performance

hdd general i/o performance server storage I/O trends

Updated 1/23/2018

Which enterprise HDD to use with a content server platform general I/O performance Insight for effective server storage I/O decision making
Server StorageIO Lab Review

Which enterprise HDD to use for content servers

This is the sixth in a multi-part series (read part five here) based on a white paper hands-on lab report I did compliments of Servers Direct and Seagate that you can read in PDF form here. The focus is looking at the Servers Direct (www.serversdirect.com) converged Content Solution platforms with Seagate Enterprise Hard Disk Drive (HDD’s). In this post the focus is around general I/O performance including 8KB and 128KB IOP sizes.

General I/O Performance

In addition to running database and file (large and small) processing workloads, Vdbench was also used to collect basic small (8KB) and large (128KB) sized I/O operations. This consisted of random and sequential reads as well as writes with the results shown below. In addition to using vdbench, other tools that could be used include Microsoft Diskspd, fio, iorate and iometer among many others.

These workloads used Vdbench configured (13) to do direct I/O to a Windows file system mounted device using as much of the available disk space as possible. All workloads used 16 threads and were run concurrently similar to database and file processing tests.

(Note 13) Sample vdbench configuration for general I/O, note different settings were used for various tests

Table-7 shows workload results for 8KB random IOPs 75% reads and 75% writes including IOPs, bandwidth and response time.

 

ENT 15K RAID1

ENT 10K RAID1

ENT CAP RAID1

ENT 10K R10
(4 Drives)

ECAP SW RAID (5 Drives)

 

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

I/O Rate (IOPs)

597.11

559.26

514

475

285

293

979

984

491

644

MB/sec

4.7

4.4

4.0

3.7

2.2

2.3

7.7

7.7

3.8

5.0

Resp. Time (Sec.)

25.9

27.6

30.2

32.7

55.5

53.7

16.3

16.3

32.6

24.8

Table-7 8KB sized random IOPs workload results

Figure-6 shows small (8KB) random I/O (75% read and 25% read) across different HDD configurations. Performance including activity rates (e.g. IOPs), bandwidth and response time for mixed reads / writes are shown. Note how response time increases with the Enterprise Capacity configurations vs. other performance optimized drives.

general 8K random IO
Figure-6 8KB random reads and write showing IOP activity, bandwidth and response time

Table-8 below shows workload results for 8GB sized I/Os 100% sequential with 75% reads and 75% writes including IOPs, MB/sec and response time in seconds.

ENT 15K RAID1

ENT 10K RAID1

ENT CAP RAID1

ENT 10K R10
(4 Drives)

ECAP SW RAID (5 Drives)

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

75% Read

25% Read

I/O Rate (IOPs)

3,778

3,414

3,761

3,986

3,379

1,274

11,840

8,368

2,891

1,146

MB/sec

29.5

26.7

29.4

31.1

26.4

10.0

92.5

65.4

22.6

9.0

Resp. Time (Sec.)

2.2

3.1

2.3

2.4

2.7

10.9

1.3

1.9

5.5

14.0

Table-8 8KB sized sequential workload results

Figure-7 shows small 8KB sequential mixed reads and writes (75% read and 75% write), while the Enterprise Capacity 2TB HDD has a large amount of space capacity, its performance in a RAID 1 vs. other similar configured drives is slower.

8KB Sequential
Figure-7 8KB sequential 75% reads and 75% write showing bandwidth activity

Table-9 shows workload results for 100% sequential, 100% read and 100% write 128KB sized I/Os including IOPs, bandwidth and response time.

ENT 15K RAID1

ENT 10K RAID1

ENT CAP RAID1

ENT 10K R10
(4 Drives)

ECAP SW RAID (5 Drives)

Read

Write

Read

Write

Read

Write

Read

Write

Read

Write

I/O Rate (IOPs)

1,798

1,771

1,716

1,688

921

912

3,552

3,486

780

721

MB/sec

224.7

221.3

214.5

210.9

115.2

114.0

444.0

435.8

97.4

90.1

Resp. Time (Sec.)

8.9

9.0

9.3

9.5

17.4

17.5

4.5

4.6

19.3

20.2

Table-9 128KB sized sequential workload results

Figure-8 shows sequential or streaming operations of larger I/O (100% read and 100% write) requests sizes (128KB) that would be found with large content applications. Figure-8 highlights the relationship between lower response time and increased IOPs as well as bandwidth.

128K Sequential
Figure-8 128KB sequential reads and write showing IOP activity, bandwidth and response time

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

Some content applications are doing small random I/Os for database, key value stores or repositories as well as meta data processing while others are doing large sequential I/O. 128KB sized I/O may be large for your environment, on the other hand, with an increasing number of applications, file systems, software defined storage management tools among others, 1 to 10MB or even larger I/O sizes are becoming common. Key is selecting I/O sizes and read write as well as random sequential along with I/O or queue depths that align with your environment.

Continue reading part seven the final post in this multi-part series here where the focus is around how HDD’s continue to evolve including performance beyond traditional RPM based execrations along with wrap up.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

HDDs evolve for Content Application servers

HDDs evolve for Content Application servers

hdds evolve server storage I/O trends

Updated 1/23/2018

Enterprise HDDs evolve for content server platform

Insight for effective server storage I/O decision making
Server StorageIO Lab Review

Which enterprise HDD to use for content servers

This is the seventh and final post in this multi-part series (read part six here) based on a white paper hands-on lab report I did compliments of Servers Direct and Seagate that you can read in PDF form here. The focus is looking at the Servers Direct (www.serversdirect.com) converged Content Solution platforms with Seagate Enterprise Hard Disk Drive (HDD’s). The focus of this post is comparing how HDD continue to evolve over various generations boosting performance as well as capacity and reliability. This also looks at how there is more to HDD performance than the traditional focus on Revolutions Per Minute (RPM) as a speed indicator.

Comparing Different Enterprise 10K And 15K HDD Generations

There is more to HDD performance than RPM speed of the device. RPM plays an important role, however there are other things that impact HDD performance. A common myth is that HDD’s have not improved on performance over the past several years with each successive generation. Table-10 shows a sampling of various generations of enterprise 10K and 15K HDD’s (14) including different form factors and how their performance continues to improve.

different 10K and 15K HDDs
Figure-9 10K and 15K HDD performance improvements

Figure-9 shows how performance continues to improve with 10K and 15K HDD’s with each new generation including those with enhanced cache features. The result is that with improvements in cache software within the drives, along with enhanced persistent non-volatile memory (NVM) and incremental mechanical drive improvements, both read and write performance continues to be enhanced.

Figure-9 puts into perspective the continued performance enhancements of HDD’s comparing various enterprise 10K and 15K devices. The workload is the same TPC-C tests used earlier in a similar (14) (with no RAID). 100 simulated users are shown in figure-9 accessing a database on each of the different drives all running concurrently. The older 15K 3.5” Cheetah and 2.5” Savio used had a capacity of 146GB which used a database scale factor of 1500 or 134GB. All other drives used a scale factor 3000 or 276GB. Figure-9 also highlights the improvements in both TPS performance as well as lower response time with new HDD’s including those with performance enhanced cache feature.

The workloads run are same as the TPC-C ones shown earlier, however these drives were not configured with any RAID. The TPC-C activity used Benchmark Factory with similar setup and configuration to those used earlier including on a multi-socket, multi-core Windows 2012 R2 server supporting a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database with a database for each drive type.

ENT 10K V3 2.5"

ENT (Cheetah) 15K 3.5"

Users

1

20

50

100

Users

1

20

50

100

TPS (TPC-C)

14.8

50.9

30.3

39.9

TPS (TPC-C)

14.6

51.3

27.1

39.3

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.4

1.6

1.7

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.3

1.8

2.1

ENT 10K 2.5" (with cache)

ENT (Savio) 15K 2.5"

Users

1

20

50

100

Users

1

20

50

100

TPS (TPC-C)

19.2

146.3

72.6

71.0

TPS (TPC-C)

15.8

59.1

40.2

53.6

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.1

0.7

0.0

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.3

1.2

1.2

ENT 15K V4 2.5"

Users

1

20

50

100

TPS (TPC-C)

19.7

119.8

75.3

69.2

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.1

0.6

1.0

ENT 15K (enhanced cache) 2.5"

Users

1

20

50

100

TPS (TPC-C)

20.1

184.1

113.7

122.1

Resp. Time (Sec.)

0.0

0.1

0.4

0.2

Table-10 Continued Enterprise 10K and 15K HDD performance improvements

(Note 14) 10K and 15K generational comparisons were run on a separate comparable server to what was used for other test workloads. Workload configuration settings were the same as other database workloads including using Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on a Windows 2012 R2 system with Benchmark Factory driving the workload. Database memory sized was reduced however to only 8GB vs. 16GB used in other tests.

Where To Learn More

Additional learning experiences along with common questions (and answers), as well as tips can be found in Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials book.

Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials Book SDDC

What This All Means

A little bit of flash in the right place with applicable algorithms goes a long way, an example being the Seagate Enterprise HDD’s with enhanced cache feature. Likewise, HDD’s are very much alive complementing SSD and vice versa. For high-performance content application workloads flash SSD solutions including NVMe, 12Gbps SAS and 6Gbps SATA devices are cost effective solutions. HDD’s continue to be cost-effective data storage devices for both capacity, as well as environments that do not need the performance of flash SSD.

For some environments using a combination of flash and HDD’s complementing each other along with cache software can be a cost-effective solution. The previous workload examples provide insight for making cost-effective informed storage decisions.

Evaluate today’s HDD’s on their effective performance running workloads as close as similar to your own, or, actually try them out with your applications. Today there is more to HDD performance than just RPM speed, particular with the Seagate Enterprise Performance 10K and 15K HDD’s with enhanced caching feature.

However the Enterprise Performance 10K with enhanced cache feature provides a good balance of capacity, performance while being cost-effective. If you are using older 3.5” 15K or even previous generation 2.5” 15K RPM and “non-performance enhanced” HDD’s, take a look at how the newer generation HDD’s perform, looking beyond the RPM of the device.

Fast content applications need fast content and flexible content solution platforms such as those from Servers Direct and HDD’s from Seagate. Key to a successful content application deployment is having the flexibility to hardware define and software defined the platform to meet your needs. Just as there are many different types of content applications along with diverse environments, content solution platforms need to be flexible, scalable and robust, not to mention cost effective.

Ok, nuff said, for now.

Gs

Greg Schulz – Microsoft MVP Cloud and Data Center Management, VMware vExpert 2010-2017 (vSAN and vCloud). Author of Software Defined Data Infrastructure Essentials (CRC Press), as well as Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press), Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier) and twitter @storageio. Courteous comments are welcome for consideration. First published on https://storageioblog.com any reproduction in whole, in part, with changes to content, without source attribution under title or without permission is forbidden.

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO. All Rights Reserved. StorageIO is a registered Trade Mark (TM) of Server StorageIO.

Collecting Transaction Per Minute from SQL Server and HammerDB

Storage I/O trends

Collecting Transaction Per Minute from SQL Server and HammerDB

When using benchmark or workload generation tools such as HammerDB I needed a way to capture and log performance activity metrics such as transactions per minute. For example using HammerDB to simulate an application making database requests performing various transactions as part of testing an overall system solution including server and storage I/O activity. This post takes a look at the problem or challenge I was looking to address, as well as creating a solution after spending time searching for one (still searching btw).

The Problem, Issue, Challenge, Opportunity and Need

The challenge is to collect application performance such as transactions per minute from a workload using a database. The workload or benchmark tool (in this case HammerDB) is the System Test Initiator (STI) that drives the activity (e.g. database requests) to a System Under Test (SUT). In this example the SUT is a Microsoft SQL Server running on a Windows 2012 R2 server. What I need is to collect and log into a file for later analysis the transaction rate per minute while the STI is generating a particular workload.

Server Storage I/O performance

Understanding the challenge and designing a strategy

If you have ever used benchmark or workload generation tools such as Quest Benchmark Factory (part of the Toad tools collection) you might be spoiled with how it can be used to not only generate the workload, as well as collect, process, present and even store the results for database workloads such as TPC simulations. In this situation, Transaction Processing Council (TPC) like workloads need to be run and metrics on performance collected. Lets leave Benchmark Factory for a future discussion and focus instead on a free tool called HammerDB and more specifically how to collection transactions per minute metrics from Microsoft SQL Server. While the focus is SQL Server, you can easily adapt the approach for MySQL among others, not to mention there are tools such as Sysbench, Aerospike among other tools.

The following image (created using my Livescribe Echo digital pen) outlines the problem, as well as sketches out a possible solution design. In the following figure, for my solution I’m going to show how to grab every minute for a given amount of time the count of transactions that have occurred. Later in the post processing (you could also do in the SQL Script) I take the new transaction count (which is cumulative) and subtract the earlier interval which yields the transactions per minute (see examples later in this post).

collect TPM metrics from SQL Server with hammerdb
The problem and challenge, a way to collect Transactions Per Minute (TPM)

Finding a solution

HammerDB displays results via its GUI, and perhaps there is a way or some trick to get it to log results to a file or some other means, however after searching the web, found that it was quicker to come up with solution. That solution was to decide how to collect and report the transactions per minute (or you could do by second or other interval) from Microsoft SQL Server. The solution was to find what performance counters and metrics are available from SQL Server, how to collect those and log them to a file for processing. What this means is a SQL Server script file would need to be created that ran in a loop collecting for a given amount of time at a specified interval. For example once a minute for several hours.

Taking action

The following is a script that I came up with that is far from optimal however it gets the job done and is a starting point for adding more capabilities or optimizations.

In the following example, set loopcount to some number of minutes to collect samples for. Note however that if you are running a workload test for eight (8) hours with a 30 minute ramp-up time, you would want to use a loopcount (e.g. number of minutes to collect for) of 480 + 30 + 10. The extra 10 minutes is to allow for some samples before the ramp and start of workload, as well as to give a pronounced end of test number of samples. Add or subtract however many minutes to collect for as needed, however keep this in mind, better to collect a few extra minutes vs. not have them and wished you did.

-- Note and disclaimer:
-- 
-- Use of this code sample is at your own risk with Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC
-- assuming no responsibility for its use or consequences. You are free to use this as is
-- for non-commercial scenarios with no warranty implied. However feel free to enhance and
-- share those enhancements with others e.g. pay it forward.
-- 
DECLARE @cntr_value bigint;
DECLARE @loopcount bigint; # how many minutes to take samples for

set @loopcount = 240

SELECT @cntr_value = cntr_value
 FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters
 WHERE counter_name = 'transactions/sec'
 AND object_name = 'MSSQL$DBIO:Databases'
 AND instance_name = 'tpcc' ; print @cntr_value;
 WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:01'
-- 
-- Start loop to collect TPM every minute
-- 

while @loopcount <> 0
begin
SELECT @cntr_value = cntr_value
 FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters
 WHERE counter_name = 'transactions/sec'
 AND object_name = 'MSSQL$DBIO:Databases'
 AND instance_name = 'tpcc' ; print @cntr_value;
 WAITFOR DELAY '00:01:00'
 set @loopcount = @loopcount - 1
end
-- 
-- All done with loop, write out the last value
-- 
SELECT @cntr_value = cntr_value
 FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters
 WHERE counter_name = 'transactions/sec'
 AND object_name = 'MSSQL$DBIO:Databases'
 AND instance_name = 'tpcc' ; print @cntr_value;
-- 
-- End of script
-- 

The above example has loopcount set to 240 for a 200 minute test with a 30 minute ramp and 10 extra minutes of samples. I use the a couple of the minutes to make sure that the system test initiator (STI) such as HammerDB is configured and ready to start executing transactions. You could also put this along with your HammerDB items into a script file for further automation, however I will leave that exercise up to you.

For those of you familiar with SQL and SQL Server you probably already see some things to improve or stylized or simply apply your own preference which is great, go for it. Also note that I’m only selecting a certain variable from the performance counters as there are many others which you can easily discovery with a couple of SQL commands (e.g. select and specify database instance and object name. Also note that the key is accessing the items in sys.dm_os_performance_counters of your SQL Server database instance.

The results

The output from the above is a list of cumulative numbers as shown below which you will need to post process (or add a calculation to the above script). Note that part of running the script is specifying an output file which I show later.

785
785
785
785
37142
1259026
2453479
3635138

Implementing the solution

You can setup the above script to run as part of a larger automation shell or batch script, however for simplicity I’m showing it here using Microsoft SQL Server Studio.

SQL Server script to collect TPM
Microsoft SQL Server Studio with script to collect Transaction Per Minute (TPM)

The following image shows how to specify an output file for the results to be logged to when using Microsoft SQL Studio to run the TPM collection script.

Specify SQL Server tpm output file
Microsoft SQL Server Studio specify output file

With the SQL Server script running to collect results, and HammerDB workload running to generate activity, the following shows Quest Spotlight on Windows (SoW) displaying WIndows Server 2012 R2 operating system level performance including CPU, memory, paging and other activity. Note that this example had about the system test initiator (STI) which is HammerDB and the system under test (SUT) that is Microsoft SQL Server on the same server.

Spotlight on Windows while SQL Server doing tpc
Quest Spotlight on Windows showing Windows Server performance activity

Results and post-processing

As part of post processing simple use your favorite tool or script or what I often do is pull the numbers into Excel spreadsheet, and simply create a new column of numbers that computes and shows the difference between each step (see below). While in Excel then I plot the numbers as needed which can also be done via a shell script and other plotting tools such as R.

In the following example, the results are imported into Excel (your favorite tool or script) where I then add a column (B) that simple computes the difference between the existing and earlier counter. For example in cell B2 = A2-A1, B3 = A3-A2 and so forth for the rest of the numbers in column A. I then plot the numbers in column B to show the transaction rates over time that can then be used for various things.

Hammerdb TPM results from SQL Server processed in Excel
Results processed in Excel and plotted

Note that in the above results that might seem too good to be true they are, these were cached results to show the tools and data collection process as opposed to the real work being done, at least for now…

Where to learn more

Here are some extra links to have a look at:

How to test your HDD, SSD or all flash array (AFA) storage fundamentals
Server and Storage I/O Benchmarking 101 for Smarties
Server and Storage I/O Benchmark Tools: Microsoft Diskspd (Part I)
The SSD Place (collection of flash and SSD resources)
Server and Storage I/O Benchmarking and Performance Resources
I/O, I/O how well do you know about good or bad server and storage I/Os?

What this all means and wrap-up

There are probably many ways to fine tune and optimize the above script, likewise there may even be some existing tool, plug-in, add-on module, or configuration setting that allows HammerDB to log the transaction activity rates to a file vs. simply showing on a screen. However for now, this is a work around that I have found for when needing to collect transaction activity performance data with HammerDB and SQL Server.

Ok, nuff said, for now…

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

February 2015 Server StorageIO Update Newsletter

Volume 15, Issue II

Hello and welcome to this February 2015 Server and StorageIO update newsletter. The new year is off and running with many events already underway including the recent USENIX FAST conference and others on the docket over the next few months.

Speaking of FAST (File and Storage Technologies) event which I attended last week, here is a link to where you can download the conference proceedings.

In other events, VMware announced version 6 of their vSphere ESXi hypervisor and associated management tools including VSAN, VVOL among other items.

This months newsletter has a focus on server storage I/O performance topics with various articles, tips, commentary and blog posts.

Watch for more news, updates and industry trends perspectives coming soon.

Commentary In The News

StorageIO news

Following are some StorageIO industry trends perspectives comments that have appeared in various print and on-line venues. Over at Processor there are comments on resilient & highly available, underutilized or unused servers, what abandoned data Is costing your company, align application needs with your infrastructure (server, storage, networking) resources.

Also at processor explore flash based (SSD) storage, enterprise backup buying tips, re-evaluate server security, new tech advancements for server upgrades, and understand cost of acquiring storage.

Meanwhile over at CyberTrend there are some perspectives on enterprise backup and better servers mean better business.

View more trends comments here

Tips and Articles

So you have a new storage device or system.

How will you test or find its performance?

Check out this quick-read tip on storage benchmark and testing fundamentals over at BizTech. Also check out these resources and links on server storage I/O performance and benchmarking tools.

View recent as well as past tips and articles here

StorageIOblog posts

Recent StorageIOblog posts include:

View other recent as well as past blog posts here

In This Issue

  • Industry Trends Perspectives
  • Commentary in the news
  • Tips and Articles
  • StorageIOblog posts
  • Events & Activities

    EMCworld – May 4-6 2015

    Interop – April 29 2015

    NAB – April 14-15 2015

    Deltaware Event – March 3 2015

    Feb. 18 – FAST 2015 – Santa Clara CA

    View other recent and upcoming events here

    Webinars

    December 11, 2014 – BrightTalk
    Server & Storage I/O Performance

    December 10, 2014 – BrightTalk
    Server & Storage I/O Decision Making

    December 9, 2014 – BrightTalk
    Virtual Server and Storage Decision Making

    December 3, 2014 – BrightTalk
    Data Protection Modernization

    November 13 9AM PT – BrightTalk
    Software Defined Storage

    Videos and Podcasts

    StorageIO podcasts are also available via and at StorageIO.tv

    From StorageIO Labs

    Research, Reviews and Reports

    StarWind Virtual SAN
    starwind virtual san

    Using less hardware with software defined storage management. This looks at the needs of Microsoft Hyper-V ROBO and SMB environments with software defined storage less hardware. Read more here.

    View other StorageIO lab review reports here.

    Resources and Links

    Check out these useful links and pages:
    storageio.com/links
    objectstoragecenter.com
    storageioblog.com/data-protection-diaries-main/

    storageperformance.us
    thessdplace.com
    storageio.com/raid
    storageio.com/ssd

    Enjoy this edition of the Server and StorageIO update newsletter and watch for new tips, articles, StorageIO lab report reviews, blog posts, videos and podcasts along with in the news commentary appearing soon.

    Cheers gs

    Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
    twitter @storageio

    All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

    Server Storage I/O Benchmark Tools: Microsoft Diskspd (Part I)

    Server Storage I/O Benchmark Tools: Microsoft Diskspd (Part I)

    server storage I/O trends

    This is part-one of a two-part post pertaining Microsoft Diskspd.that is also part of a broader series focused on server storage I/O benchmarking, performance, capacity planning, tools and related technologies. You can view part-two of this post here, along with companion links here.

    Background

    Many people use Iometer for creating synthetic (artificial) workloads to support benchmarking for testing, validation and other activities. While Iometer with its GUI is relatively easy to use and available across many operating system (OS) environments, the tool also has its limits. One of the bigger limits for Iometer is that it has become dated with little to no new development for a long time, while other tools including some new ones continue to evolve in functionality, along with extensibility. Some of these tools have optional GUI for easy of use or configuration, while others simple have extensive scripting and command parameter capabilities. Many tools are supported across different OS including physical, virtual and cloud, while others such as Microsoft Diskspd are OS specific.

    Instead of focusing on Iometer and other tools as well as benchmarking techniques (we cover those elsewhere), lets focus on Microsoft Diskspd.


    server storage I/O performance

    What is Microsoft Diskspd?

    Microsoft Diskspd is a synthetic workload generation (e.g. benchmark) tool that runs on various Windows systems as an alternative to Iometer, vdbench, iozone, iorate, fio, sqlio among other tools. Diskspd is a command line tool which means it can easily be scripted to do reads and writes of various I/O size including random as well as sequential activity. Server and storage I/O can be buffered file system as well non-buffered across different types of storage and interfaces. Various performance and CPU usage information is provided to gauge the impact on a system when doing a given number of IOP’s, amount of bandwidth along with response time latency.

    What can Diskspd do?

    Microsoft Diskspd creates synthetic benchmark workload activity with ability to define various options to simulate different application characteristics. This includes specifying read and writes, random, sequential, IO size along with number of threads to simulate concurrent activity. Diskspd can be used for testing or validating server and storage I/O systems along with associated software, tools and components. In addition to being able to specify different workloads, Diskspd can also be told which processors to use (e.g. CPU affinity), buffering or non-buffered IO among other things.

    What type of storage does Diskspd work with?

    Physical and virtual storage including hard disk drive (HDD), solid state devices (SSD), solid state hybrid drives (SSHD) in various systems or solutions. Storage can be physical as well as partitions or file systems. As with any workload tool when doing writes, exercise caution to prevent accidental deletion or destruction of your data.


    What information does Diskspd produce?

    Diskspd provides output in text as well as XML formats. See an example of Diskspd output further down in this post.

    Where to get Diskspd?

    You can download your free copy of Diskspd from the Microsoft site here.

    The download and installation are quick and easy, just remember to select the proper version for your Windows system and type of processor.

    Another tip is to remember to set path environment variables point to where you put the Diskspd image.

    Also stating what should be obvious, don’t forget that if you are going to be doing any benchmark or workload generation activity on a system where the potential for a data to be over-written or deleted, make sure you have a good backup and tested restore before you begin, if something goes wrong.


    New to server storage I/O benchmarking or tools?

    If you are not familiar with server storage I/O performance benchmarking or using various workload generation tools (e.g. benchmark tools), Drew Robb (@robbdrew) has a Data Storage Benchmarking Guide article over at Enterprise Storage Forum that provides a good framework and summary quick guide to server storage I/O benchmarking.




    Via Drew:

    Data storage benchmarking can be quite esoteric in that vast complexity awaits anyone attempting to get to the heart of a particular benchmark.

    Case in point: The Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) has developed the Emerald benchmark to measure power consumption. This invaluable benchmark has a vast amount of supporting literature. That so much could be written about one benchmark test tells you just how technical a subject this is. And in SNIA’s defense, it is creating a Quick Reference Guide for Emerald (coming soon).


    But rather than getting into the nitty-gritty nuances of the tests, the purpose of this article is to provide a high-level overview of a few basic storage benchmarks, what value they might have and where you can find out more. 

    Read more here including some of my comments, tips and recommendations.


    In addition to Drew’s benchmarking quick reference guide, along with the server storage I/O benchmarking tools, technologies and techniques resource page (Server and Storage I/O Benchmarking 101 for Smarties.

    How do you use Diskspd?


    Tip: When you run Microsoft Diskspd it will create a file or data set on the device or volume being tested that it will do its I/O to, make sure that you have enough disk space for what will be tested (e.g. if you are going to test 1TB you need to have more than 1TB of disk space free for use). Another tip is to speed up the initializing (e.g. when Diskspd creates the file that I/Os will be done to) run as administrator.

    Tip: In case you forgot, a couple of other useful Microsoft tools (besides Perfmon) for working with and displaying server storage I/O devices including disks (HDD and SSDs) are the commands "wmic diskdrive list [brief]" and "diskpart". With diskpart exercise caution as it can get you in trouble just as fast as it can get you out of trouble.

    You can view the Diskspd commands after installing the tool and from a Windows command prompt type:

    C:\Users\Username> Diskspd


    The above command will display Diskspd help and information about the commands as follows.

    Usage: diskspd [options] target1 [ target2 [ target3 …] ]
    version 2.0.12 (2014/09/17)

    Available targets:
    file_path
    # :

    Available options:











    -?display usage information
    -a#[,#[…]]advanced CPU affinity – affinitize threads to CPUs provided after -a in a round-robin manner within current KGroup (CPU count starts with 0); the same CPU can be listed more than once and the number of CPUs can be different than the number of files or threads (cannot be used with -n)

    -ag

    group affinity – affinitize threads in a round-robin manner across KGroups
    -b[K|M|G]block size in bytes/KB/MB/GB [default=64K]

    -B[K|M|G|b]

    base file offset in bytes/KB/MB/GB/blocks [default=0] (offset from the beginning of the file)
    -c[K|M|G|b]create files of the given size. Size can be stated in bytes/KB/MB/GB/blocks

    -Ccool down time – duration of the test after measurements finished [default=0s].

    -DPrint IOPS standard deviations. The deviations are calculated for samples of duration . is given in milliseconds and the default value is 1000.
    -dduration (in seconds) to run test [default=10s]
    -f[K|M|G|b]

    file size – this parameter can be used to use only the part of the file/disk/partition for example to test only the first sectors of disk
    -fropen file with the FILE_FLAG_RANDOM_ACCESS hint
    -fsopen file with the FILE_FLAG_SEQUENTIAL_SCAN hint
    -Ftotal number of threads (cannot be used with -t)
    -gthroughput per thread is throttled to given bytes per millisecond note that this can not be specified when using completion routines
    -hdisable both software and hardware caching
    -inumber of IOs (burst size) before thinking. must be specified with -j
    -jtime to think in ms before issuing a burst of IOs (burst size). must be specified with -i
    -ISet IO priority to . Available values are: 1-very low, 2-low, 3-normal (default)
    -lUse large pages for IO buffers

    -Lmeasure latency statistics
    -ndisable affinity (cannot be used with -a)
    -onumber of overlapped I/O requests per file per thread (1=synchronous I/O, unless more than 1 thread is specified with -F) [default=2]
    -pstart async (overlapped) I/O operations with the same offset (makes sense only with -o2 or grater)
    -Penable printing a progress dot after each completed I/O operations (counted separately by each thread) [default count=65536]
    -r[K|M|G|b]random I/O aligned to bytes (doesn’t make sense with -s). can be stated in bytes/KB/MB/GB/blocks [default access=sequential, default alignment=block size]
    -R

    output format. Default is text.
    -s[K|M|G|b]stride size (offset between starting positions of subsequent I/O operations)
    -Sdisable OS caching
    -tnumber of threads per file (cannot be used with -F)
    -T[K|M|G|b]stride between I/O operations performed on the same file by different threads [default=0] (starting offset = base file offset + (thread number * ) it makes sense only with -t or -F
    -vverbose mode
    -wpercentage of write requests (-w and -w0 are equivalent). absence of this switch indicates 100% reads IMPORTANT: Your data will be destroyed without a warning
    -W

    warm up time – duration of the test before measurements start [default=5s].
    -xuse completion routines instead of I/O Completion Ports
    -Xuse an XML file for configuring the workload. Cannot be used with other parameters.
    -zset random seed [default=0 if parameter not provided, GetTickCount() if value not provided]




     
    Write buffers command options. By default, the write buffers are filled with a repeating pattern (0, 1, 2, …, 255, 0, 1, …)
    -Z

    zero buffers used for write tests
    -Z[K|M|G|b]use a global buffer filled with random data as a source for write operations.
    -Z[K|M|G|b],

    use a global buffer filled with data from as a source for write operations. If is smaller than , its content will be repeated multiple times in the buffer. By default, the write buffers are filled with a repeating pattern (0, 1, 2, …, 255, 0, 1, …)







     Synchronization command options
    -ys
    signals event
    before starting the actual run (no warmup) (creates a notification event if does not exist)
    -yfsignals event after the actual run finishes (no cooldown) (creates a notification event if does not exist)
    -yrwaits on event before starting the run (including warmup) (creates a notification event if does not exist)
    -ypallows to stop the run when event is set; it also binds CTRL+C to this event (creates a notification event if does not exist)
    -yesets event and quits









    Event Tracing command options

    -epuse paged memory for NT Kernel Logger (by default it uses non-paged memory)
    -equse perf timer
    -esuse system timer (default)
    -ecuse cycle count
    -ePROCESSprocess start & end
    -eTHREADthread start & end
    -eIMAGE_LOADimage load
    -eDISK_IOphysical disk IO
    -eMEMORY_PAGE_FAULTSall page faults
    -eMEMORY_HARD_FAULTShard faults only
    -eNETWORK

    TCP/IP, UDP/IP send & receive
    -eREGISTRYregistry calls



    Examples:

    Create 8192KB file and run read test on it for 1 second:

    diskspd -c8192K -d1 testfile.dat

    Set block size to 4KB, create 2 threads per file, 32 overlapped (outstanding)
    I/O operations per thread, disable all caching mechanisms and run block-aligned random
    access read test lasting 10 seconds:

    diskspd -b4K -t2 -r -o32 -d10 -h testfile.dat

    Create two 1GB files, set block size to 4KB, create 2 threads per file, affinitize threads
    to CPUs 0 and 1 (each file will have threads affinitized to both CPUs) and run read test
    lasting 10 seconds:

    diskspd -c1G -b4K -t2 -d10 -a0,1 testfile1.dat testfile2.dat

    Where to learn more


    The following are related links to read more about servver (cloud, virtual and physical) storage I/O benchmarking tools, technologies and techniques.
    resource page

    Server and Storage I/O Benchmarking 101 for Smarties.

    Microsoft Diskspd download and Microsoft Diskspd overview (via Technet)

    I/O, I/O how well do you know about good or bad server and storage I/Os?

    Server and Storage I/O Benchmark Tools: Microsoft Diskspd (Part I and Part II)

    Wrap up and summary, for now…


    This wraps up part-one of this two-part post taking a look at Microsoft Diskspd benchmark and workload generation tool. In part-two (here) of this post series we take a closer look including a test drive using Microsoft Diskspd.

    Ok, nuff said (for now)

    Cheers gs

    Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)

    twitter @storageio


    All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved