Worried about IT M&A, here come the new startups!

Storage I/O trends

Late last year , I did a post (see here) countering the notion that there is a lack of innovation in IT and specifically around data storage. Recently I did a post about a Funeral for Friend, not to mention yesterdays post about Summer marriages.

For those who are concerned about lack of innovation, or, that consolidation will result in just a few big vendors, here’s some food for thought. Those big vendors in addition to growing via internal organic growth, also grow by buying or merging with other vendors. Those other vendors emerge as startups, some grow, blossom and are bought, some make a decent business on their own, some are looking to be bought, some need to be bought, some will see fire sales, liquidation or simply closing their doors and perhaps re-launching as a new company.

With all the M&A activity currently that has taken place, and I’m sure (speculation only ;) ) that there will be plenty more, here’s a short and far from comprehensive list of some startups or companies you may not have heard of yet. There are additional ones who are still in deep stealth, some on the list are still in stealth, yet talking and letting information trickle out, thus only non-NDA information is being shown here. In other words, you can find out about these via publicly available information and sources.

Something that I have noticed and talked with others in the industry about is that this generation of startups, at least for now are taking a far more low-key approach to their launches than in the past. Gone at least for now are the Dot COM era over the top announcements in some cases before there was even a product or shipping for actual customer production deployment scenario. This crop or corps of startups are taking their time leveraging the current economic situation to further incubate their technologies and go to market strategies, not to mention minimizing the amount of over the top VC funding we have seen in the past. Some of these may not appear to be storage related and that would be correct. This list includes those associated with data infrastructure technolgies from servers, to storage to networking, hardware, software and services among othes as a common theme.

Disclosure Notice: None of these companies mentioned are nor have ever been clients of StorageIO. Why do I mention this, why not!

Balesio – File compression solutions
Box.net – Internet/web/cloud storage service with high availability and backup
Cirrustore – Backup data protection tools
Dataslide – Hard rectangular disk (HRD)
Enclarity – Healthcare CRM and analysis tools
Enstratus – Amazon cloud computing management tools
Exludas – Multi core optimize
Firescope – CMDB data solutions
Greenbytes – ZFS based storage management solutions
Likewise – Open backup software for macs/linux/windows
Liquidcomputing – High density servers
Maxiscale – Web infrastructure (Stealth)
Metalogix – Archiving solutions
Neptuny – Capacity Planning
Netronome – Network and I/O optimization technology
Newboundary – IT policy management and IRM tools
Nexenta ZFS – based storage management solutions
Pergamumsystems – Archive solutions (Stealth)
Pranah – SMB Storage vendor formerly known as Marner
Procedo – Archiving and migration solutions
Rebit – Backup and data protection solutions
Rightscale – Amazon cloud computing management tools
Rmsource – Cloud backup solutions
RNAnetworks – Virtual memory management solutions
Scale Computing – Clustered storage management software
ScaleMP – Multi-core virtualization for scale out
SiberSystems – Goodsync data protection solutions
Sparebackup – Backup data protection solutions
StorageFusion – Storage resource analysis
Storspeed – NAS/NFS optimization solutions (Stealth)
Sugarsync – Backup and data protection solutions
Surgient – Cloud computing solutions
Synology – SMB storage solutions
TwinStrata – BC/DR analysis and assessment tools
Vadium – Security and encryption tools
Vembu – Backup data protection tools
Versant – Object database management solutions
Vipre – Security, data loss, data leak prevention
VirtenSys – Virtual I/O and I/O virtualization (IOV)
Vizrt – Video management software tools
WhipTail – Flash SSD solutions
Xenos – Archive and data footprint reduction solutions

Links to the above along with many other companies including manufactures and vars can be found on the Interesting Links page at StorageIO.

Food for thought for your summer technology picnic fun.

Nuf said for now.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press, 2011), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press, 2009), and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier, 2004)

twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2012 StorageIO and UnlimitedIO All Rights Reserved

Summer Weddings: EMC+Datadomain and HP+IBRIX

Storage I/O trends

Are you friend or family of the bride or groom?

Here’s comes the bride! (Audio)

That’s a question me and Mrs. Schulz were asked recently when we attended a wedding.

Summer months particularly June and August are known as wedding months (Hmmm, more merger & acquisition activity to come?). Summer is a nice time of the year for marriages at least in the U.S. and how ironic that we have already seen two well publicized IT data storage industry unions in the past couple of weeks, not to mention other smaller less publicized ones.

In one case, the California based bride (Datadomain-DDUP) had two courtiers (Massachusetts based EMC and California based NetApp, plus rumors of others). Fortunately one of those had a prenuptial that earned them a cool $57 million for their efforts (NetApp-NTAP) when EMC won the bride. Read more including some of my comments and perspectives among others about EMC, NTAP and DDUP here and here.

Yesterday, on a mid-July Friday, when things are normally quiet, in true wedding industry forum, news was released (here and here) that California based HP announced that it had bought Massachusetts based data and storage management software vendor IBRIX.

That’s a lot of activity involving California and Massachusetts in the past couple of weeks, not to mention the tornado sightings in the vicinity of EMCs Hopington Massachusetts headquarters coincidently around the same time the marriage to DDUP was formerly announced! What’s’ next, Aerosmith is out on tour, perhaps the Del Fuegos or Boston will perform at one of these wedding parties?

Within the data storage industry, publicly traded Datadomain (DDUP) is fairly well known to many for their role in helping to popularize the data footprint impact reduction technique refereed to as de-duplication (e.g. normalization, commonality factoring, intelligent compression, etc.). Adding to the awareness of DDUP was the recent highly public courtship with EMC eventually out-bidding NTAP with a dowry of about $2.1B USD. That type of press coverage and monetary amounts might normally be expected for the likes of a Madonna, Brittney Spears, Michael Jackson-RIP, Paris Hilton, Elizabeth Taylor or other celebrity unions covered by paparazzi with a similar number of attorneys involved.

On the other hand, IBRIX while known to some, is a lessor known entity compared to DDUP having taken a lower profile than even some of their close competitors. However for those who have been following and covering the clustered storage market (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here ), IBRIX is a well known entity.

IBRIX also has had ties to EMC having been involved in a pre-mari age affair with an reseller arrangement along with being "rumored" ;) to have been involved with ATMOS cloud or policy based storage solution formerly known as "Hulk". IBRIX has also quietly been involved with others like Dell as well as HP in similar to EMC reseller arrangements. Where IBRIX has been positioned is to address high performance, scale out parallel or concurrent clustered file system needs, both big and small I/O, sequential and random data storage and access. For example, in the media/entertainment and other industries along with enabling large Internet providers a bulk (low cost, high capacity) scale-out NAS (NFS & CIFS) option.

One of the reasons that IBRIX has been involved with the likes of EMC, Dell and HP among others is that unlike other vendors such as BlueArc, the once high-flying Isilon, NetApp, Onstor or Panasas, not to mention EMC Cellera NAS , is that those solutions are all bundled with proprietary hardware while IBRIX is software based. Where IBRIX Fusion fits is to enable NAS storage solutions using industry standard hardware (servers and storage) that are capable of being configured for both high performance compute (HPC) along with for low-cost general purpose bulk storage to support Web 2.0, social networking, home directories or on-line archives.

Consequently, and HP or Dell who just happen to sell servers, have had the ability of meeting large scale out and scale up NAS file serving applications by re-selling IBRIX installed on their servers or blade servers with either their own entry to mid-range lower cost, high performance and high capacity storage along with that of 3rd party vendors.

Ironically one of IBRIX’s competitors in the software NAS solution market was and remains PolyServe, software that HP acquired a couple of years ago to create their own scale out NAS solution (e.g. EFS). Other software based solutions include among others Lustre (Sun), CXFS (SGI), EMC ATMOS (I’m sure some will argue this is not scale out or NAS, will leave it at that for now) ;) not to mention those from IBM, Microsoft, Quantum (also re-sold by HP) or Symantec.

What does HP get with IBRIX?

Simple, the ability to own the IP (intellectual proprietary) that one of their competitors had been "rumored" to have been working with at one point, IP that their competitors had been reselling like themselves.

Thus HP gets more software IP that can and has been sold along with their hardware such as the Proliant servers and blade servers giving their customers choice, similar to what HP and other vendors do with their open servers. For example, HP had the ExDS9000 extreme storage system built on a blade server with high density, low cost, high capacity HP storage (e.g. HP Modular Disk System 600, HP MSA or even EVA).

This makes for a nice solution for bulk on-line and near-line storage applications where the emphasis is not as much on performance, rather massive scalability for storing on-line documents, archives, videos, images and other unstructured content which is where there is a lot of growth activity. The challenge is that the ExDS9x00 has only been available with the HP PolyServe software which works good for some environments, yet, for others, the clustered file system scale out capabilities of IBRIX were deployed.

With the addition of IBRIX, HP now should be able to provide their customers and prospects the choice of software to meet specific needs while maintaining an HP footprint, that is both hardware, software and services. HP has several different storage software stacks that they now own (e.g. Lefthand for clustered iSCSI, PolyServe for NFS/CIFS NAS, IBRIX for Clustered File system scale out NAS) not to mention those that it OEMS including among others Bycast (Medical Archive System) that is also OEM’d by IBM as their Medical Grid combined with IBM SOFS, Quantum StorNext and Microsoft Windows Storage Server and Sepaton (VTL and Dedupe) to name a few.

Do I think this was a good move by HP?

Yes as it gives them control over IP that they had been reselling as had some of their competitors who left IBRIX to HP to grab up. HP now has the IP which they can package with their hardware similar to how they have been doing, and giving customers choices to align the right hardware and software technology to the task at hand.

Whether it be Bycast for medical archiving, PolyServe or IBRIX for scale out NAS, Lefthand for clustered iSCSI, Sepaton for VTL and dedupe, Microsoft, Quantum StorNext for shared block storage serving or any of the other software packages HP offers with their industry standard servers, the customer has options.

For IBRIX customers and prospects, this move will give them a boost in a confidence that their decisions and investments are safe.

Ironically, vendors like Symantec with their Scaleable File Serving (SFS) clustered NAS solution that is also software based and runs on anyone’s open servers including those from HP gets a potential shot in the arm with HP validating the model and approach for bulk-storage and clustered NAS (Oh Mr. Salem, Mr. Dell is holding on Line 1, Mr. Chambers is on line 2 and Mr. Ellison on line 3 ;) )

Who’s going to be at the alter next? IMHO, I would keep an eye on (and this all just pure speculation) Bycast, Symantec, EMLX (Broadcom was a wake up call), Quantum, Sepaton, STEC, StorMagic, or ACS, maybe even 3PAR among other possibilities (think outside of the lines). I would not rule out a major game changer such as someone buying NetApp or the likes of an HP buying an EMC or Oracle buying a CSC, maybe even a CSCO buying someone like NTAP, how about Oracle buying NTAP and putting some attorneys out of work, not to mention, who will MSFT hook up with? Anything is possible as we have seen and traditional M&A wisdom is out the window.

Have fun at the next wedding you attend, go easy on the cake and wedding punch, especially if you will be doing any dancing (please, no You tube videos of the chicken dance) and be careful throwing rice or other items.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

SPC and Storage Benchmarking Games

Storage I/O trends

There is a post over in one of the LinkedIn Discussion forums about storage performance council (SPC) benchmarks being miss-leading that I just did a short response post to. Here’s the full post as LinkedIn has a short post response limit.

While the SPC is far from perfect, it is at least for block, arguably better than doing nothing.

For the most part, SPC has become a de facto standard for at least block storage benchmarks independent of using IOmeter or other tools or vendor specific simulations, similar how MSFT ESRP is for exchange, TPC for database, SPEC for NFS and so forth. In fact, SPC even recently rather quietly rolled out a new set of what could be considered the basis for Green storage benchmarks. I would argue that SPC results in themselves are not misleading, particularly if you take the time to look at both the executive and full disclosures and look beyond the summary.

Some vendors have taken advantage of the SPC results playing games with discounting on prices (something that’s allowed under SPC rules) to show and make apples to oranges comparisons on cost per IOP or other ploys. This proactive is nothing new to the IT industry or other industries for that matter, hence benchmark games.

Where the misleading SPC issue can come into play is for those who simply look at what a vendor is claiming and not looking at the rest of the story, or taking the time to look at the results and making apples to apples, instead of believing the apples to oranges comparison. After all, the results are there for a reason. That reason is for those really interested to dig in and sift through the material, granted not everyone wants to do that.

For example, some vendors can show a highly discounted list price to get a better IOP per cost on an apple to oranges basis, however, when processes are normalized, the results can be quite different. However here’s the real gem for those who dig into the SPC results, including looking at the configurations and that is that latency under workload is also reported.

The reason that latency is a gem is that generally speaking, latency does not lie.

What this means is that if vendor A doubles the amount of cache, doubles the number of controllers, doubles the number of disk drives, plays games with actual storage utilization (ASU), utilizes fast interfaces from 10 GbE  iSCSI to 8Gb FC or FCoE or SAS to get a better cost per IOP number with discounting, look at the latency numbers. There have been some recent examples of this where vendor A has a better cost per IOP while achieving a higher number of IOPS at a lower cost compared to vendor B, which is what is typically reported in a press release or news story. (See a blog entry that also points to a CMG presentation discussion around this topic here.

Then go and look at the two results, vendor B may be at list price while vendor A is severely discounted which is not a bad thing, as that is then the starting list price as to which customers should start negotiations. However to be fair, normalize the pricing for fun, look at how much more equipment vendor A may need while having to discount to get the price to offset the increased amount of hardware, then look at latency.

In some of the recent record reported results, the latency results are actually better for a vendor B than for a vendor A and why does latency matter? Beyond showing what a controller can actually do in terms of levering  the number of disks, cache, interface ports and so forth, the big kicker is for those talking about SSD (RAM or FLASH) in that SSD generally is about latency. To fully effectively utilize SSD which is a low latency device, you would want a controller that can do a decent job at handling IOPS; however you also need a controller that can do a decent job of handling IOPS with low latency under heavy workload conditions.

Thus the SPC again while far from perfect, at least for a thumb nail sketch and comparison is not necessarily misleading, more often than not it’s how the results are utilized that is misleading. Now in the quest for the SPC administrators to try and gain more members and broader industry participation and thus secure their own future, is the SPC organization or administration opening itself up to being used more and more as a marketing tool in ways that potentially compromise all the credibility (I know, some will dispute the validity of SPC, however that’s reserved for a different discussion ;) )?

There is a bit of Déjà here for those involved with RAID and storage who recall how the RAID Advisory Board (RAB) in its quest to gain broader industry adoption and support succumbed to marketing pressures and use or what some would describe as miss-use and is now a member of the “Where are they now” club!

Don’t get me wrong here; I like the SPC tests/results/format, there is a lot of good information in the SPC. The various vendor folks who work very hard behind the scenes to make the SPC actually work and continue to evolve it also all deserve a great big kudos, an “atta boy” or “atta girl” for the fine work that have been doing, work that I hope does not become lost in the quest to gain market adoption for the SPC.

Ok, so then this should all then beg the question of what is the best benchmark. Simple, the one that most closely resembles your actual applications, workload, conditions, configuration and environment.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

Green Storage is Alive and Well: ENERGY STAR Enterprise Storage Stakeholder Meeting Details

While Green hype and green washing may be on the endangered species list if not already extinct, there are many things taking place to shift the focus from talking about being green to enabling and leveraging efficiency and optimization to boost productivity and enable business sustainability.

The industry has seen and is seeing the shift from the initial green hype cycle of a few years ago to the more recent trough of disillusionment (or here) typically found with a post technology or trend hangover, to the current re-emergence, and growing awareness of the many different faces and facets of being green.

Granted there has been some recent activity by the U.S. government to add new climate control legislation (e.g. HR2454 – Waxman/Markey) to build on previous clean air acts of the 1990s as well as those dating back to the 1970s and earlier.

While the green gap (or here) still exists with confusion by IT organizations that Green is only Green if and only if it is about reducing Carbon footprints as opposed to the realization that there are many different faces or facets of being Green and efficient. For example, there is also a growing awareness that addressing power, cooling, floor-space or footprint to enable sustained business growth as well as enabling next generation virtual, cloud as well as traditional forms of IT service ennablement has both economic and business benefits. That is, determining energy usage, shifting from energy avoidance to expanding and supporting energy efficiency initiatives along with boosting productivity, doing more with what you have, fitting into and growing within current or future constraints on available power, cooling, footprint/floorpsace, budget or manpower constraints while improving on service delivery to remain competitive. (Learn more in "The Green and Virtual Data Center" (CRC) )
The Green and Virtual Data Center Book

Regardless of if you are a eco-tech warrior or not, learning about and then closing the Green gap and how shifting a focus towards efficiency has both business economic and environmental benefits and helps to break down some of the perceptions about what Green is or is not.

One such activity is the U.S. EPA Energy Star program which is about as much energy avoidance as it is about energy efficiency You might be familiar with Energy Star logos on various consumer products around your home or office as well as for laptops, notebooks, desktop and workstations. Recently EPA released a new standard specification for Energy Star for Servers and is now currently working on one for enterprise storage. As part of the initiative, stakeholders or those with an interest in data storage are invited to participate in upcoming EPA working sessions to provide feedback and input on what is important to you.

US EPA Energy Star wants and needs you!US EPA Energy Star Logo

Here’s the message received from the EPA via their mailing list this past week (in italics below):

Dear Enterprise Storage Stakeholder or Other Interested Party:

Provided below are additional details regarding the ENERGY STAR® Enterprise Storage Stakeholder Meeting scheduled for Monday, July 20, 2009 in San Jose, CA.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to use this opportunity to review feedback on the ENERGY STAR Specification Framework document and discuss initial plans for a Draft 1 specification. A conference call line will be provided to stakeholders who are unable to participate in person.

Date: Monday, July 20, 2009
Time: 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM Pacific Time (lunch will be provided)
Location: The Sainte Claire Hotel, 302 South Market St., San Jose, CA 95113, 408.295.2000, www.thesainteclaire.com
Conference Call Phone: Provided with meeting registration

EPA would like to thank the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) for providing lunch, refreshments, and logistical support for the ENERGY STAR stakeholder meeting.

For the convenience of meeting attendees, this event is being held in conjunction with the SNIA Technical Symposium being held July 20-23, 2009.

For more information on this event visit: ;

The Sainte Claire Hotel is offering a special room rate of $149/night for participants in the ENERGY STAR Stakeholder Meeting.  Rooms can be booked by following the link to the SNIA Technical Symposium Web site.

Please note: Whether you plan to attend in person or via conference call, you must RSVP to storage@energystar.gov no later than Monday, July 13, 2009. Conference call information and a copy of presentation materials will be distributed to all registered attendees in advance of the meeting.

As a reminder, stakeholders are encouraged to submit feedback on the ENERGY STAR Enterprise Storage Specification Framework to storage@energystar.gov no later than this Friday, July 3, 2009.

The latest program documentation is available for download at www.energystar.gov/newspecs.

If you have any questions please contact Steve Pantano, ICF International, at spantano@icfi.com or Andrew Fanara, US EPA, at fanara.andrew@epa.gov.

Thank you for your continued support of ENERGY STAR!

Learn more at www.energystar.gov

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

Big Fish and Small Fish – Fish story or the one that did not get away?

Its been a very busy year and we are not quite half way through 2009 yet. For those who follow or read this blog as well as other venues where I have material appear, or give interviews, quotes and perspectives, or have appeared in person, you probably have caught on that its been a busy year for me along with my book “The Green and Virtual Data Center”. However, all work and no play makes for a dull day and recently as things have finally settled down just a bit for a few weeks during the early summer time of the year, I have been able to get out and enjoy the out doors including fishing to which I must prefer over golf (I don’t have the patience for the game ;) ).

However, as is often the case when relaxing, some things can be come clear, new ideas come to mind and one such recent one is the notion of the big fish and the small fish. What caught my thoughts was that there is often the infatuation with the big fish, the big game vs. the fun of catching something small just for the fun of it.

Freshwater drum, Photo Courtesy Karen Schulz (C) 2009

Freshwater drum I caught near our home on the St. Croix River

Now don’t get me wrong, I enjoy deep-sea saltwater or even great lakes fishing, I enjoy the pursuit of the elusive walleye or other game fish, however a friend recently helped me to acquaint myself with the simplicity of catching small pan fish such as sunfish aka bluegills or pumpkin seeds.

What has become fun about this over the past week or two is one, the big game or sport fish have been elusive and instead of listening to stories of what got away or what’s not biting or how bad the fishing has been, me and fishing friend decided to change the game a bit and find what was biting or just for fun, do something different. Low and behold, about a week ago we set out to see how many species of fish we could catch in a day and we ended up with about three dozen sunnies (we threw almost all of them back, e.g. released), over a dozen bass including some large ones most of which were also released, a nice channel cat which was set free to find its friend cat-fish hunter, not to mention various others including a swamp shark aka northern pike, the cousin to the muskie and distant relative, or at least a perceived similarities to the barracuda.

Being a member of "The St. Croix Hookers, Catch and Release Division", most of the fish get released, however now and then we will keep some for dinner.

The other evening, I decided to try something different again which was to use very light tackle, an ice fishing rod to be precise and fish out of a kayak for sunnies, sure enough, it was not easy, the catch was not big, however the reward was fantastic in terms of getting into some backwaters we could not normally go with the regular boats, and yes, even caught a fish and yes, there were others that got away.

Greg fishing from Kyak - Photo courtesy of Karen Schulz (c) 2009 all rights reserved
It’s not a monster, however on light line, an ice fishing rod and from a kyak, it’s a blast! (Photo courtesy of Karen Schulz (C) 2009)

Catfish caught on St. Croix River - Photo by Greg Schulz (c) 2009
Catfish Caught on St. Croix River! (Photo courtesy of Greg Schulz (C) 2009)

I find it interesting that so many vendors, especially startups are in pure pursuit of the big game, the big fish which of course should the catch it, they have a story to talk about.

However I have also seen where so many ignore revenue, footprint, mind share and success at the cost of big game fishing for what ever reasons. This is where I realized a similarity with fishing recently. The same elusive fish that everyone else from other startups to existing players are all in pursuit of, yet so often get neglected the other smaller fish that while it takes more of, help to add to the footprint and success stories to build on, not to mention gather experience.

Granted, its tough to make a meal on just small fish, however there is balance and even the biggest of vendors are showing an awareness of the need for balanced portfolio from SOHO to SMB to SME to enterprise offerings from servers, storage, I/O networking, hardware, software and services.

Food for thought when the technology fishing slows during the dog days of summer, change-up the game or the approach a bit, explore alternate opportunities, try old tricks with new techniques to keep things interesting and productive. Certainly don’t ignore where everyone else is fishing or pursuing, however, break away and try something different, or, perhaps an area or opportunity that others might be ignoring or forgetting about in their pursuit of the big one that may end up getting away!

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

Greg Schulz – StorageIO, Author “The Green and Virtual Data Center”. (CRC)
Technorati tags: The Green and Virtual Data Center

Funeral for a Friend

Spring is not supposed to be a time for send offs, after all, its supposed to be the time when things come to life or refresh from winter sleep or hibernation such plants, flowers, trees, grass, spring animals, fishing opening after spawning not to mention spring weddings. With the passing this week of Ed McMahon, Farah Fawcett and Michael Jackson, you might think that’s the funeral for a friend I’m referring.

While I have fond memories of Ed McMahon as Johnny Carson’s side kick on the tonight show, that’s not the funeral for a friend.

Likewise, who can forget Farah Fawcett and her poster, even though we share something in common, that is she died in the same hospital that I was born in, that’s not the funeral I’m referring to.

Image courtesy of www.mostlyposters.com

Neither is the passing of Michael Jackson that is not only flooding the media, its also testing and taxing many web sites and data infrastructures (here, and here among others), that’s not the funeral for a friend I’m referring to either.

Now I do not know anyone who has succumbed to the N1H1 (swine flue) virus yet, and while people have died from it, so far it seems like some IT technologies (insert your favorite or non-favorite technology here), everyone is talking about it, however who actually has it, so that’s not the funeral I’m referring to.

Nor is the Elton John song from Yellow Brick Road what I’m referring to.

No, the funeral for a friend that I’m referring to is a different one all together, its the funeral for the magnetic hard disk drive (e.g. disk drive or HDD) that we have come to know and rely upon, in some cases for some people, they don’t even know that they have been relying on a HDD in their PC or computer or notebook. For some, they think that the HDD is just memory (actually it is), or in their TiVo or DVR, or the magic resource in the cloud, internet, web hosting or managed service site where different files and data can be stored and backed-up to. Yes, it was a sad funeral as many go however the HDD was not alone at the funeral, as many of its contemporaries were also being eulogized including Green IT, Fibre Channel, the IBM mainframe, Microsoft Windows, magnetic tape, printers, RAID, IT data centers, physical copper networking wiring and the combustion engine to name a few others.

What do these all have in common and why was there a funeral? Becuase they have been declared as being dead by someone, or perhaps wished that they were dead by others! Like them or not, we rely on them all, they become a friend, a friend that sometimes you get along with, and at times that you are at odds with, however a friend never the less. Thus it was impressive to see the large virtual crowd in attendance for this funeral or wake, after all, most in attendance, including the deceased were scratching their heads (even the disks – some of you will get the humor ;) ) as after all, non of the deceased are actually dead.

Does that mean if they are not dead, yet supposed to be dead that they are ghosts or zombies? It turns out the afore mentioned are examples of what I commonly refer to as Zombie technologies in that they have been declared dead by pundits or marketers trying to prop up something new, yet the technologies continue to be enhanced and sold by vendors often with little to no fanfare as IT customers will buy, deploy use and rely on these technologies.

Granted, in some cases the technologies may not be the current best friend or industry darling, however there is a dependence on these and other technologies.

I mean think about it, RAID is dead so new raid or dist. Parity or something else can take RAIDs place (I attended the RAID sendoff recently). Or that the HDD is dead so that the market can switch over to FLASH SSD, another recent send-off. Or that tape is dead at the hands of dedupe, that was lasts weeks send off, or the mainframe, Fibre Channel and so forth. In some cases, some could not attend their own funeral as they were to busy supporting all of the demands of more data to move, process and store including the bloggers, twitters, texters, friend feeders and so forth.

One of the interesting things about going to these send offs is meeting up with old friends and acquaintances to hear what they are doing these days, for example, in addition to some people, I ran into the mainframe who is still busy working. I saw and talked to the mini-server who has been busy hosting VMware and Microsoft HyperV consolidation that also showed me photos of its new blades.

Fibre Channel was looking robust and energized excited about its upcoming new role combined with Ethernet as FCoE. The disk drive had hoped to be retired by now however, while some of the high performance Fibre Channel variants might fade away with 2.5" high performance SAS HDDs picking up that slack while SSD continues to mature and evolve, not to mention even larger capacity HDDs picking up more work, the HDD see’s that it will be working for at least another decade as there is just too much work to be done in an economical mannor to retire to some day isle (you know, that place that you say some day Isle go there)… In fact the HDDs were telling me about how they have to be ready to be deployed in hosting, managed services as well as cloud sites when those finally ramp-up on large scale basis beyond today’s web and infrastructure hosting providers.

Some of the zombies told me how they are working with new peer technologies or have been repackaged and new marketing campaigners as part of their awareness tour, similar to promoters bring aging rock stars back out on highly productive and profitable tours for their fans while helping to promote the new material.

During one of these recent sendoffs, I was pondering this and all of a sudden it dawned on me and a bright light bulb went on that drew enough watts to make a high-end server or storage system look efficient. The emergence of the new technology hype was causing all of these send-offs. Here’s what I came up with by doing some quick analysis on the back of one of the funerals during a long winded eulogy that was further out there than a 12MByte 55 slide deck complete with ramifications during a 15-30 minute product launch WebEx, Goto Meeting or other session.

Having had the revelation, I decided to do some analysis, you know, the thing that analysts are supposed to such as thinking outside the box, looking at different trends, issues, spotting patterns, coming up with different perspectives some of which may be outside the box or not mainstream, sometimes taking a view that is contrarian or skeptical, applying that gray matter between the ears (not the gray hair)…

In the quest to launch new products, perhaps due to a lack of innovative marketing to promote innovative and evolutionary technologies, the trend is to simply declare something else dead so the new technology can replace it which had me wondering is if its not the technology that’s dead, rather, has creative marketing died? Recently the HDD or disk drive has once again been declared dead (as has magnetic tape and others) as it has been many times over the past 50 plus years of existence, after all, it can be a bit of a sport or make for easy game to jump up and declare something dead as after all, with technology there always has to be something new to talk about.

The reality is that many IT organizations are risk averse, the are creatures of habits, they use and leverage what they know, what they trust and in some cases regardless of if they like the technology or not, thus, the importance of bridging the gap between the past, what works, what is known and field proven including the good, the bad and the ugly aspects as transitions are made to new technology and techniques. The trick is not clinging to the past with a death grip while ignoring the future, or likewise, jumping in with both feet to the new techniques and technology, after all, many environments are risk averse so the only way leading bleeding edge approaches are taken is if there is a dual redundant blood bank located next door (that some more IT HA humor ; ) )

Here’s my point, contrary to renewed focus that the disk drive is dead at the hands of solid state disk (SSD) and FLASH in particular, I’m not clinging to the past as I have been and remain a fan of SSD for about 20 years. However also seeing the reality, and not choosing to simply jump on yet another SSD bandwagon movement, it is safe to say that the HDD in various shapes and forms will be around for at least another decade. Likewise, magnetic tape which has been declared dead for I don’t know how many decades also continues to be enhanced and deployed and thus not dead. In fact, when I talk with IT folks around the world and ask them if they care to admit to using tape, its fun to watch them look around the room to see who is going to catch them raise their hands, then sure enough, when comfortable, 65-75% of the hands go up.

Now to be fare, many of these same organizations are using some form of disk based backup and data protection in conjunction with repositioning (here, here, here, and here among others) tape for ultra-low cost, ultra energy efficient (e.g. green) storage. Changing usage of tape include for long term data retention including archive, full backup that were staged first to disk as well as compliance among other purposes.

Thus the notion of tiered storage, that is leveraging the most applicable technology aligned to the task at hand to meet service and cost requirements while balancing performance, availability, capacity and energy efficiency in a flexible manor comes to mind, after all, there is no such thing as a data recession!

Does this mean that new technologies including de-dupe, thin-provisioning, clusters, grids, clouds, SaaS, Soa, object based, virtualization, SSD and many others are not being deployed? They are in fact being deployed alongside in many cases with the so called zombie or dead technologies in what some might think of as a mentoring program of sorts. That is bridging the past to the future, case in point being virtual tape libraries (VTLs see also here, and here among others) that make disk look like tape to fool existing backup and data protection software, processes and procedures while leveraging new techniques including space saving snapshots, staging data to disk as a cache or buffer before streaming to tape, using data footprint techniques including compression and de-dupe among others.

Now remembering some actual deceased from the technology world, various IT firms, technologies, and individuals no longer with us, some who gave their all to help propel the industry to get it to where it is today and still evolving including TCAM, Storage Service Providers (SSP), RAID Advisory Board (RAB), Token Ring, Briton Lee Database machine (DejaVu anyone?), Imperial Technologies (An SSD vendor), SF2 (Bought by MTI, Patents bought by EMC), Pirus (Bought by Sun and then discontinued), DEC (Bought by Compaq and then by HP), DG (Bought by EMC), Wang (Getronics), Openvision (Bought by Veritas, bought by Symantec), Memorex (Brand bought by Imation), Next, and Osborne not to mention influences such as Ray Norda, Grace Hopper, Thomas Watson, Blaze Pascal, Seymor Cray and Al Shugart among many many others, RIP.

Now to the technology zombies including among others Backup, Data Centers, Ethernet, Facebook, Fibre Channel, IT Professionals, Landline Telecommunications, Mainframe, Magnetic Hard Disk Drives, Magnetic Tape, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Windows, non-clustered storage, Personal Computers and Desktops, Printers, RAID, Twitter, Unix to name a few. RIP, continue working, evolving, prospering, helping those who rely on you or continue to invest in you and remember, that in your passing, you are not only laying the ground work for the future, you are the bridge between the old and the new that allows those who rely upon you to continue doing what they need to do while your eventual successors continue to incubate, emerge, mature and evolve leveraging you are a mentor and peer.

Don’t feel bad if one of the technologies that you use and rely on has been declared dead, instead, celebrate and have a wake of sorts, in fact, get the sales or marketing person who is telling you that your technology is dead to pay for the cost of the wake as part of their admission into becoming part of your technology family and future IT data infrastructure After all, even virtual and cloud environments still rely on many of these so called dead technologies to keep their costs of service down, while keeping their availably and performance up, is that ironic or what!

In the meantime, for the actual deceased, RIP Ed, Farah, Michael and all of the others, and for those technology zombies not quite ready to lay to rest yet, best wishes and stay in touch!

Nuf said for now.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press, 2011), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press, 2009), and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier, 2004)

twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2011 StorageIO and UnlimitedIO All Rights Reserved

Introducing US HR2454 – Waxman-Markey Climate Bill

US HR2454 – Waxman-Markey Climate Bill

In case you have not heard yet…

On a related note to a recent post pertaining to energy efficiency vs. energy avoidance and common perception that Green IT is all about carbon footprints (e.g. the Green Gap), here’s some material for those who like to read or talk about carbon and emissions trading schemes (ETS). Currently in the US congress, there is legislation making the rounds generically called the Waxman-Markey Climate Change bill or also known as HR2454 e.g. American Clean Energy and Security Act (coverage here, here, here and here among others). This is the latest version at a clean energy and climate bill and its effects or impacts on IT or business is yet to be clear, other than a presumed tax increase of some form such as a surcharge or fee tacked onto your energy bill as is the case today with other environmental or compliance initiatives.

Given the amount of energy used by the aviation industry, an industry that is far more likely to be impacted by ETS or other initiatives than IT (at least initially), its been interesting to watch what’s been going on in the aviation world for the past couple of years now with regards to climate and environmental concerns. Now without being an alarmist, or claiming an inconvient truth, for background and insight, here’s a link to a recent piece (Emissions Trading Could Be Inevitable) from AWST to put some things into perspective on caps, trade and related ETS topics on a global basis perhaps shedding some light on what could impact other industries and their supply chains.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press, 2011), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press, 2009), and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier, 2004)

twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2012 StorageIO and UnlimitedIO All Rights Reserved

Shifting from energy avoidance to energy efficiency

Storage I/O trends

I’m continually amazed at the number of people in the IT industry from customers to vendors, vars to media and even analysts who associate Green IT with and only with reducing carbon footprints. I guess I should not be surprised given the amount of rhetoric around Green and carbon both in the IT industry as well as in general resulting in a Green Gap.

The reality as I have discussed in the past is that Green IT while addressing carbon footprint topics, is really more about efficiency and optimization for business economic benefits that also help the environment. From a near-term tactical perspective, Green IT is about boosting productivity and enabling business sustainability during tough economic times, doing more with less, or, doing more with what you have. On a strategic basis, Green IT is about continued sustainability while also improving top and bottom line economics and repositioning IT as a competitive advantage resource.

There is a lot of focus on energy avoidance, as it is relatively easy to understand and it is also easy to implement. Turning off the lights, turning off devices when they are not in use, enabling low-power, energy-savings or Energy Star® (now implemented for servers with storage being a new focus) modes are all means to saving or reducing energy consumption, emissions, and energy bills.

Ideal candidates for powering down when not in use or inactive include desktop workstations, PCs, laptops, and associated video monitors and printers. Turning lights off or implementing motion detectors to turn lights off automatically, along with powering off or enabling energy-saving modes on general-purpose and consumer products has a significant benefit. New generations of processors such as the Intel Xeon 5xxx or 7xxx series (formerly known as Nehalem) provide the ability to boost performance when needed, or, go into various energy conservation modes when possible to balance performance, availability and energy needs to applicable service requirements, a form of intelligent power management.

In Figure 1 are shown four basic approaches (in addition to doing nothing) to energy efficiency. One approach is to avoid energy usage, similar to following a rationing model, but this approach will affect the amount of work that can be accomplished. Another approach is to do more work using the same amount of energy, boosting energy efficiency, or the complement—do the same work using less energy.

Tiered Storage
Figure 1 the Many Faces of Energy Efficiency (Source: “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC)

The energy efficiency gap is the difference between the amount of work accomplished or information stored in a given footprint and the energy consumed. In other words, the bigger the energy efficiency gap, the better, as seen in the fourth scenario, doing more work or storing more information in a smaller footprint using less energy.

Given the shared nature of their use along with various intersystem dependencies, not all data center resources can be powered off completely. Some forms of storage devices can be powered off when they are not in use, such as offline storage devices or mediums for backups and archiving. Technologies such as magnetic tape or removable hard disk drives that do not need power when they are not in use can be used for storing inactive and dormant data.

Avoiding energy use can be part of an approach to address power, cooling, floor space and environmental (PCFE) challenges, particularly for servers, storage, and networks that do not need to be used or accessible at all times. However, not all applications, data or workloads can be consolidated, or, powered down due to performance, availability, capacity, security, compatibility, politics, financial and many other reasons. For those applications that cannot be consolidated, the trick is to support them in a more efficient and effective means.

Simply put, when work needs to be done or information needs to be stored or retrieved or data moved, it should be done so in the most energy-efficient manner aligned to a given level of service which can mean leveraging faster, higher performing resources (servers, storage and networks) to get the job done fast resulting in improved productivity and efficiency.

Tiering is an approach that applies to servers, storage, and networks as well as data protection. For example, tiered servers include large frame or mainframes, rack mount as well as blades with various amounts of memory, I/O or expansion slots and number of processor cores at different speeds. Tiered storage includes different types of mediums and storage system architectures such as those shown in figure 2. Tiered networking or tiered access includes 10Gb and 1Gb Ethernet, 2/4/8 Gb Fibre Channel, Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), iSCSI, NAS and shared SAS among others. Tiered data protection includes various technologies to meet various recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO) such as real-time synchronous mirroring with snapshots, to periodic backup to disk or tape among other approaches, techniques and technologies.

Technology alignment (Figure 2), that is aligning the applicable type of storage or server resource and devices to the task at hand to meet application service requirements is essential to archiving an optimized and efficient IT environment. For example, for very I/O intensive active data as shown in figure 2, leveraging ultra fast tier-0 high-performance SSD (FLASH or RAM) storage, or for high I/O active data, tier-1 fast 15.5K SAS and Fibre Channel storage based systems would be applicable.

For active and on-line data, that’s where energy efficiency in the form of fast disk drives including RAM SSD or FLASH SSD (for reads, writes are another story) and in particular fast 15.5K or 10K FC and SAS energy efficient disks and their associated storage systems come into play. The focus for active data and storage systems should be around more useful work per unit of energy consumed in a given footprint. For example, more IOPS per watt, more transactions per watt, more bandwidth or video streams per watt, more files or emails processed per watt.

Tiered Storage

Figure 2 Tiered Storage: Balancing Performance, Availability, Capacity and Energy to QoS (Source: “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC)

For low-performance, low activity applications where the focus is around storing as much data as possible with the lowest cost including for disk to disk based backup, slower high capacity SATA based storage systems are the fit (lower right in figure 2). For long-term bulk storage to meet archiving, data retention or other retention needs as well as storing large monthly full backups or long term data preservation, tape remains the ticket for large environments with the best combination of performance, availability capacity and energy efficiency and cost per footprint.

General approaches to boost energy efficiency include:

  • Do more work using the same or less amount of power and subsequently cooling
  • Leverage faster processors/controllers that use the same or less power
  • Apply applicable RAID level to application and data QoS requirements
  • Consolidate slower storage or servers to a faster, more energy-efficient solution
  • Use faster disk drives with capacity boost and that draw less power
  • Upgrade to newer, faster, denser, more energy-efficient technologies
  • Look beyond capacity utilization; keep response time and availability in mind
  • Leverage IPM, AVS, and other techniques to vary performance and energy usage
  • Manage data both locally and remote; gain control and insight before moving problems
  • Leverage a data footprint reduction strategy across all data and storage tiers
  • Utilize multiple data footprint techniques including archive, compression and de-dupe
  • Reduce data footprint impact, enabling higher densities of stored on-line data

Find a balance between energy avoidance and energy efficiency, consolidation and business enablement for sustainably, hardware and software, best practices including policy and producers, as well as leveraging available financial rebates and incentives. Addressing green and PCFE issues is a process; there is no one single solution or magic formula.

Efficient and Optimized IT Wheel of Oppourtunity

Figure 3 Wheel of Opportunity – Various Techniques and Technologies for Infrastructure Optimization (Source: “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC)

Instead, leverage a combination of technologies, techniques, and best practices to address various issues and requirements is needed (Figure 3). Some technologies and techniques include among others infrastructure resource management (IRM), data management, archiving (including for non-compliance), and compression (on-line and off-line, primary and secondary) as well as de-dupe for backups, space saving snapshots, and effective use of applicable raid levels.

Green washing and green hype may fade away, however power, cooling, footprint, energy (PCFE) and related issues and initiatives that enable IT infrastructure optimization and business sustainability will not fade away. Addressing IT infrastructure optimization and efficiency is thus essential to IT and business sustainability and growth in an environmentally friendly manner which enables shifting from talking about green to being green and efficient.

Learn more on the tips, tools, articles, videos and reports page as well as in “Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking” (CRC) pages, “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC) pages at StorageIO.com.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

Help Save a Life!

For those who have not seen or heard yet via one of the many different social networking venues, there is a person named Nick Glasgow age 28 who lives in the Bay Area who has Leukemia (AML).

Nick (See video here) is in need of a bone marrow transplant and needs your help. I don’t know Nick, however he works in the IT industry. Nick is 3/4 Caucasian and 1/4 Japanese – which is critical to the match. If you are, or know of anyone who might have this makeup, ask them to be tested to see if they are a match to be a donor.

I know many other people in the industry and in the social networking universe who are also all trying to help in anyway they can to get the word out about Nick.

Your help can be as simple as referring others to the site found at this link, or, checking to see if you are a match, or spreading the word about Nick.

An example of how people are helping out in addition to spreading the word, re-tweeting and emailing is Steve Duplessie, a fellow IT industry analyst and founder of the Enterprise Strategy Group.

Steve beet cancer several years ago and has pledged $5,000 to who ever ends as a match to help nick, as well as $5,000 to whom ever finds the person who matches Nick’s bone marrow type (see Steve’s blog for more information).

I would like to help and thus I have posted on Steve’s blog that I am pledging a plane ticket to whom ever is a match to go and be a donor for Nick, as well as plane ticket for whom ever finds the person to be a match to help Nick out.

Now, what can you do to help and what better way to start a memorial day weekend here in the U.S. or where ever you are in the world than to help someone else out and perhaps save a life.

UPDATE: Heres a link from Len Devanna with more information about helping out Nick Glasgow.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Founder StorageIO, Author “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC)

Technorati tags: Nick Glasgow, Steve Duplessie, IT, Leukemia, Len Devanna

Hello From EMC World Bloggers Lounge

EMC Blogger Lounge at EMCworld The day is looking up, it started out early, too early with a 7AM flight to Orlando leaving a nice sunny day in MSP arriving in MCO (that’s Minneapolis and Orlando for those who don’t use IATA airport codes) during a heavy rainstorm with plenty of storm clouds in the area ;) .

Oh, for those concerned about green and flying, the Boeing 757 with a pretty full passenger load of about 150 including two search and rescue dogs (they were in the row behind me) got about 65 miles per gallon per passenger, not to shabby for the 2.5 hour flight.

Once registered at the event, I attended an analyst session this afternoon that included a question and answer discussion session with Joe Tucci and other EMC folks.

Now I’m spending a few minutes in the bloggers lounge (where there are also several twitters as well) having a much needed cappuccino and trying out my flip video camcorder.

Here’s a quick video taken with my new flip video camcorder I won in a raffle giveaway. Plenty of EMC and partner loggers as well as others have been coming and going, some you may even recognize in the video. The flip camcorder is pretty easy to use both in terms of setup, configuration, shooting 1st video, editing, and uploading for use in this blog post from EMCworld.

Time to get ready for some more meetings before a dinner event tonight and more meetings over the next couple of days, now back to your regularly scheduled programming, nuff said for now.

BTW – Anyone going to the Brocade margaritaville event tomorrow night in Orlando, just received my orange wrist band!

Cheers gs
Greg Schulz – StorageIO, Author “Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking” (CRC Press) and “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC)

R U Twittering Yet?

For those of you who are twitter fans, you can skip this post if you like as you are already twittering and know what it’s about, however feel free to follow me if you are not already doing so @storage.

On the other hand, for those of you new or not familiar with twitter (click here to learn more and sign-up) also known as micro blogging, is yet another venue and means to communicate, collaborate, network or what have you. In a nutshell, twitter messages, posts or tweets are 140 characters that appear on your twitter page for followers to view and respond to. For longer tweets or long URL’s, tiny URL’s can be used.

You can also include other tweeters in a post so your post will appear on their pages for discussion. Tweets can also be forwarded to others via a RT or retweet. Tweets as they are refereed to can be done via a web interface, from an iphone or other mobile device, or via email such as Microsoft Outlook with OutTwit.

Think of twitter as a cross between blogging, texting, IM and a few other things smashed together. For the competitive or status seekers, there are even grading or ranking sites to see or show how you stack up or compare to others.

Some tweets are discussion points, some are smash or trash talk, some are adds or news feeds, some are random thoughts or musings. Some people tweet constantly while others tweet now and then with some actively following and tweeting, while others simply lurk. Some follow others who follow-them, others simply post and follow few if anyone. Tweeters range from corporate or organizations to individuals for work or for fun for almost any cause, its really up to you how, when, why and where you want to tweet from.

Here’s a link to a blog post that I did late last year about what I refer to as tiered communications. While some may have a strong preference for one medium or venue vs. another, I see the different social networking, web 2.0 and related venues including facebook, twitter, friend feed, linkedin, plaxo, blogs, RSS, web sites and IM among others as different tiers and tools for communicating.

Check twitter out when you get a chance and start tweeting if the spirit so moves you, tweet you soon, however word of caution, tweeting can be addictive for some!

I can be found and followed @storageio or www.twitter.com/storageio and happy tweekend as its Friday.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press, 2011), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press, 2009), and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier, 2004)

twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2011 StorageIO and UnlimitedIO All Rights Reserved

Determining Computer or Server Energy Use

Recently I posted a response to a question over at IT Knowledge Exchange (e.g. ITKE) about how to determine power or energy use.

In a nutshell:

Depending on what you are looking for, or trying to accomplish, you may, or may not need a formula per say.

For example, if all you need to know is how many volts, amps, watts, kva, or btu’s are used by a particular computer or other IT device for that matter, first things first check the “tag” or “label” on the device as well as included documentation, or, on-line spec sheets and documentation.

There are also some measuring devices including among others Kill A Watt that you can plug a device into and see volts, amps, watts, and so forth.

Ok, that might have been the obvious and easy part, now on to the next step.

Often a name plate may give kva however not watts, or perhaps amps and volts however not kva or some other metric. This is where the various conversion formulas come into play.

For example, if you know volts and amps, you can get watts, if you know kva along with watts, amps or volts, you can derive the others, or, if you have btus, you can watts, or if you know watts you can get btus and so forth.

Btu/Hour = watts * 3.413
Watts = Btu/Hour * 0.293
Watts = Amps * Volts
Volts = Watts / Amps
Amps = Watts / Volts
VoltAmps (Va) = Volts * amps
KVA = (Volts * Amps) / 1000

Here’s a link to some additional conversions and formulas that along with many others are found in my new book “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC).

www.thegreenandvirtualdatacenter.com/greenmetrics.html

In “The Green and Virtual Data Center” (CRC). book, there is an entire chapter on metrics, where and how to find them, formulas, conversions as well as other related items including determining energy costs, carbon footprints, cooling and more across servers, storage, networks, facilities along with associated management tools.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

U.S. EPA Energy Star for Server Update

Following up on previous blog posts, here’s the latest on the U.S. EPA Energy Star for Servers program (in italics below) that was received this week:

Dear Server Manufacturer or Other Industry Stakeholder,

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) welcomes your input on the attached Final Draft ENERGY STAR® Version 1.0 Computer Server specification. Also attached is the latest version of the Power and Performance Data Sheet, referenced in Section 3.C of the specification. Please note that this is the final opportunity to comment on EPA’s proposal prior to finalization.

Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments on the Final Draft specification and Power and Performance Data Sheet to Rebecca Duff, ICF International, at rduff@icfi.com no later than May 8, 2009. 

The data set used to derive newly proposed I/O Idle allowances will be available for download from the ENERGY STAR Enterprise Server specification development Web page at www.energystar.gov/NewSpecs within the next several days. 

Stakeholders with questions or concerns can contact Andrew Fanara, EPA, at (206) 553-6377 or fanara.andrew@epa.gov.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved

U.S. EPA Looking for Industry Input on Energy Star for Storage

Following up on previous blog posts, here is some information that the U.S. EPA is looking for comments from industry on an Energy Start for enterprise storage program following on the heels of the Energy Star for Server program.

US EPA Energy Star LogoUS EPA Energy Star wants and needs you!
U.S. EPA Energy Star Wants and Needs You!

Here’s the message received from the EPA via their mailing list this past week (in italics below):

Dear Enterprise Storage Equipment Manufacturers and Other Interested Parties:

Please see the attached letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announcing their intent to pursue development of an ENERGY STAR specification for Enterprise Storage equipment.  If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Andrew Fanara, EPA, at fanara.andrew@epa.gov or Stephen Pantano, ICF International, at spantano@icfi.com.

Thank you for your support of ENERGY STAR.

Here’s the intro letter excerpted from the above email notification (in italics below):

April 23, 2009

Dear Enterprise Storage Equipment Manufacturers and Other Interested Parties:

This letter is intended to inform all stakeholders that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to continue its efforts towards the development of an ENERGY STAR® specification for enterprise data storage equipment. Following is an outline of EPA’s general goals and next steps.


ENERGY STAR is a voluntary partnership between government, businesses, and purchasers designed to encourage the manufacture, purchase, and use of efficient products to help protect the environment. Products that earn the ENERGY STAR prevent greenhouse gas emissions by meeting strict energy efficiency guidelines. Manufacturers that qualify their products to meet ENERGY STAR requirements may use the label as a tool to educate their customers about the enhanced value of these products.

To date:
•More than 2,000 manufacturers are partnering with ENERGY STAR,
•More than 40,000 product models carry the ENERGY STAR label across more than 50 product categories,
•More than 70% of Americans recognize the ENERGY STAR label,
•Consumers have purchased more than 2.5 billion ENERGY STAR qualified products, and
•Americans, with the help of ENERGY STAR, saved enough energy in 2008 to avoid greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to those from 29 million cars — while saving $19 billion on utility bills.

In the last several years, the energy saving opportunities in data centers have been well documented. However, barriers to energy efficiency still persist and need to be addressed. EPA is pursuing a dual strategy to overcome these challenges by helping purchasers more easily identify energy efficient IT equipment with the use of the ENERGY STAR designation, and by encouraging organizations to benchmark the energy performance of their data centers.


In pursuit of this strategy, EPA will introduce an ENERGY STAR Computer Server specification in the coming weeks. In addition, EPA recently conducted a scoping effort to evaluate enterprise storage products for inclusion in the ENERGY STAR program. EPA reviewed available market research and facilitated discussions with product manufacturers, industry associations, and other interested parties. EPA concluded that IT purchasers would benefit from access to standardized information about the energy performance of storage equipment made available through the ENERGY STAR program. As a result, EPA intends to begin the specification development process. Details on this process will be forthcoming in the next several weeks.

To be added to the enterprise storage e-mail distribution list, please send your full contact information to Stephen Pantano at spantano@icfi.com. To stay informed about the ENERGY STAR specification development process for computer servers and other EPA data center initiatives please visit: www.energystar.gov/datacenters.


Thank you for your continued support of ENERGY STAR and please direct additional questions to Andrew Fanara at fanara.andrew@epa.gov or Stephen Pantano of ICF International, at spantano@icfi.com.

Sincerely,

Andrew Fanara
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Protection Partnerships Division ENERGY STAR Program Manager

My take on the Energy Star programs is that as long as they add value including reflecting how energy is effectively used both when IT equipment such as servers and storage are in use, as well as in energy saving or avoidance modes are reflected, they can and should be a good thing.

However industry will need to work together across different trade and focus groups as well as factor in how supporting metrics will be applicable and reflective thus accepted by IT data center environments. This means metrics and measurements for both active or working while in use energy efficiency modes such as IOPS, bandwidth, messages or transactions, files or videos per watt of energy, as well as metrics for in-active or dormant data such as capacity per watt per usable footprint. Check out Chapter 5 (Measurements and Metrics) in "The Green and Virtual Data Center" (CRC) to learn more.

Various industry trade and focus groups including Storage Performance Council (SPC), SNIA GSI, Green Grid, SPEC and others are working on various metrics and aligning themselves to work with EPA. If you are in an IT data center involved with servers or storage, consider getting involved with one or more of these groups to help influence and shape what these programs will look like or affect your organization in the future.

Ok, nuff said.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)
twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2024 Server StorageIO and UnlimitedIO LLC All Rights Reserved