Measuring Windows performance impact for VDI planning

August 10, 2011 – 1:21 pm

Here is a link to a recent guest post that I was invited to do over at The Virtualization Practice (TVP) pertaining to measuring the impact of Windows Boot performance and what that means for planning for Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) initiatives.

With Virtual Desktop Infrastructures (VDI) initiatives adoption being a popular theme associated with cloud and dynamic infrastructure environments a related discussion point is the impact on networks, servers and storage during boot or startup activity to avoid bottlenecks. VDI solution vendors include Citrix, Microsoft and VMware along with various server, storage, networking and management tools vendors.

A common storage and network related topic involving VDI are boot storms when many workstations or desktops all startup at the same time. However any discussion around VDI and its impact on networks, servers and storage should also be expanded from read centric boots to write intensive shutdown or maintenance activity as well.

Having an understanding of what your performance requirements are is important to adequately design a configuration that will meet your Quality of Service (QoS) and service level objectives (SLOs) for VDI deployment in addition to knowing what to look for in candidate server, storage and networking technologies. For example, knowing how your different desktop applications and workloads perform on a normal basis provides a baseline to compare with during busy periods or times of trouble. Another benefit is that when shopping for example storage systems and reviewing various benchmarks, knowing what your actual performance and application characteristics are helps to align the applicable technology to your QoS and SLO needs while avoiding apples to oranges benchmark comparisons.

Check out the entire piece including some test results using the hIOmon tool from hyperIO to gather actual workstation performance numbers.

Keep in mind that the best benchmark is your actual applications running as close to possible to their typical workload and usage scenarios.

Also keep in mind that fast workstations need fast networks, fast servers and fast storage.

Ok, nuff said for now.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking (CRC Press, 2011), The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC Press, 2009), and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier, 2004)

twitter @storageio

All Comments, (C) and (TM) belong to their owners/posters, Other content (C) Copyright 2006-2011 StorageIO All Rights Reserved

  1. 11 Trackback(s)

  2. Nov 28, 2011: New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) | StorageIOblog
  3. Dec 12, 2011: New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) « Data-Center.BlogNotions - Thoughts from Industry Experts
  4. Jan 30, 2012: Should you feel sorry for revenue prevention departments? - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
  5. Sep 27, 2012: Cloud, virtualization, storage and networking in an election year - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
  6. Nov 19, 2012: 2012 industry trends perspectives and commentary (predictions) | StorageIOblog
  7. Jan 28, 2013: The Data Center Journal Putting some VMware ESX storage tips together
  8. May 19, 2013: How many IOPS can a HDD, HHDD or SSD do? | StorageIOblog
  9. May 30, 2013: How many IOPS can a HDD, HHDD or SSD do? - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
  10. Jun 19, 2013: Putting some VMware ESX storage tips together (Part I) | StorageIOblog
  11. Jun 20, 2013: How many IOPS can a HDD, HHDD or SSD do? - The Data Center Journal
  12. Aug 24, 2013: Cloud, virtualization, storage and networking in an election year | StorageIOblog

Post a Comment

Powered by Disqus