Has FCoE entered the trough of disillusionment?

September 17, 2010 – 12:56 am

This is part of an ongoing series of short industry trends and perspectives blog posts briefs based on what I am seeing and hearing in my conversations with IT professionals on a global basis.

These short posts compliment other longer posts along with traditional industry trends and perspective white papers, research reports, videos, podcasts, webcasts as well as solution brief content found a www.storageio.com/reports and www.storageio.com/articles.

Has FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet) entered the trough of disillusionment?

IMHO Yes and that is not a bad thing if you like FCoE (which I do among other technologies).

The reason I think that it is good that FCoE is in or entering the trough is not that I do not believe in FCoE. Instead, the reason is that most if not all technologies that are more than a passing fad often go through a hype and early adopter phase before taking a breather prior to broader longer term adoption.

Sure there are FCoE solutions available including switches, CNAs and even storage systems from various vendors. However, FCoE is still very much in its infancy and maturing.

Based on conversations with IT customer professionals (e.g those that are not vendor, vars, consultants, media or analysts) and hearing their plans, I believe that FCoE has entered the proverbial trough of disillusionment which is a good thing in that FCoE is also ramping up for deployment.

Another common question that comes up regarding FCoE as well as other IO networking interfaces, transports and protocols is if they are temporal (temporary short life span) technologies.

Perhaps in the scope that all technologies are temporary however it is their temporal timeframe that should be of interest. Given that FCoE will probably have at least a ten to fifteen year temporal timeline, I would say in technology terms it has a relative long life for supporting coexistence on the continued road to convergence which appears to be around Ethernet.

That is where I feel FCoE is at currently, taking a break from the initial hype, maturing while IT organizations begin planning for its future deployment.

I see FCoE as having a bright future coexisting with other complimentary and enabling technologies such as IO Virtualization (IOV) including PCI SIG MRIOV, Converged Networking, iSCSI, SAS and NAS among others.

Keep in mind that FCoE does not have to be seen as competitive to iSCSI or NAS as they all can coexist on a common DCB/CEE/DCE environment enabling the best of all worlds not to mention choice. FCoE along with DCB/CEE/DCE provides IT professionals with choice options (e.g. tiered I/O and networking) to align the applicable technology to the task at hand for physical or

Again, the questions pertaining to FCoE for many organizations, particularly those not going to iSCSI or NAS for all or part of their needs should be when, where and how to deploy.

This means that for those with long lead time planning and deployment cycles, now is the time to putting your strategy into place for what you will be doing over the next couple of years if not sooner.

For those interested, here is a link (may require registration) to a good conversation taking place over on IT Toolbox regarding FCoE and other related themes that may be of interest.

Here are some links to additional related material:

That is all for now, hope you find these ongoing series of current or emerging Industry Trends and Perspectives posts of interest.

Of course let me know what your thoughts and perspectives are on this and other related topics.

Cheers gs

Greg Schulz – Author The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)

twitter @storageio

  • http://blogstu.wordpress.com stu

    Hooray – this means we’re past the hype and on our way to simply using the technology in the places where it makes sense. FCoE is “just in there” for a lot of solutions from Cisco, HP, IBM and others and as 10Gb becomes more ubiquitous and DCB is available more places, it’s just another option in the portfolio.

  • Greg

    You are correct sir!

  • http://etherealmind.com Etherealmind

    Nah. People will perceive too much risk in supporting multiple protocols and technologies, that’s the messaging of today. Therefore customers are going to make a choice to support one technology (sadly) to reduce costs and risk. Since cheap always wins, iSCSI will be successful in the near future and the longer term.

    FCoE is temporary at best. The fall off in sales of FibreChannel is a guide to the long term death of the both technologies.

  • Visiotech

    I think pNFS will win over FCoE in a long run. Just because pNFS truly solve one of the biggest problem in storage. True data file sharing across vendors. FCoE does not address this problem. It is just another protocol on the wire with FC/SCSI-3 limitation. It is a device and port sharing and not a data sharing.

    For storage vendors focusing on block base will fall short soon or later. pNFS is not ready but soon to be. Like any storage protocols, it takes time to reach stability. I expect it will take another two-three years before significant adoption assuming it will be ready mid-next year.

  • Greg

    Thanks for the comments.

    Perhaps someday all storage will be accessed via something other than block or even file, and granted, file based access continues to gain in popularity/deployments. However near term, its safe to say that block storage at least for some enviroments will remain viable just as file is important to others.

    pNFS has a bright future just like NFS CIO and DIO do for those who know or hear about them as their implementations improve.

    Cheers gs

  • Greg

    Thanks for the comments

    The fun thing about having different interfaces, mediums and protocols is to be able to align them to their needs, or preferences. Fibre Channel is reaching the pleateu of productivity mean that rampup sales may be slowing, however there is a large installed base that wont convert overnight to some other medium. However, at some point, some will move from FC to iSCSI, some to FCoE, some to NAS, some even to object based including T10 OSD not to mention others sloooowwwlllly moving off of FC.

    I would concur that FCoE like all networking or other technologies is temporary, however that time span may be a relatively short 10-15+ years ;).

    Cheeers gs

  • Pingback: Is FCoE Struggling to Gain Traction, or on a normal adoption course? | StorageIOblog

  • Pingback: Is FCoE Struggling to Gain Traction, or on a Normal Adoption Course? | SiliconANGLE

  • Pingback: The new Green IT: Efficient, Effective, Smart and Productive | StorageIOblog

  • Pingback: Is FCoE Struggling to Gain Traction, or on a normal adoption course? - StorageIO - IBM Storage Community

  • Pingback: Dude, is Dell going to buy Brocade? | StorageIOblog